Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mn. Pub. Int. Res. Group v. Mn. Env. QC, 237 N.W.2d 375.

20 citing documents.

In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376
In the Matter of Petition of N. St. Power 676 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376
Mowry v. Young 565 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
“[J]u-dicial review of [quasi-judicial] administrative action is the rule, and non-reviewability an exception which must be demonstrated.” Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370 , 376 n. 7, , 379 n. 7 (1975) (quoting Barlow v. Collins, 397 U.S. 159, 166 , 90 S.Ct.
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370 , 376 n. 7 & 379, , 379 n. 7 & 381 (1975) (implicitly recognizing that preclusion of judicial review might exist, and stating that "[i]n the absence of any language in the statute precluding judicial review, we hold that Minnesota courts have jurisdiction to hear appeals in these cases from decisions of the EQC”).
In Re ST 497 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376 , (footnote omitted).
In re Adopt S.T. 497 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376 , (footnote omitted).
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 495 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1993
Mortenson v. State 446 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See, e.g., Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370
In re the Occupational License of Haymes 427 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376
Kleven v. Commissioner of Public Safety 399 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376
In re Mostrom 390 N.W.2d 893 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Further, we found support in Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370 , which states: “[Pjreclusion of judicial review of administrative action adjudicating private rights is not lightly to be inferred.
Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone 386 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
See MPIRG v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 382 , (interpretation of the statutory phrase “need for environmental review” is within agency discretion).
Followed Voettiner v. Commissioner of Education 376 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376 , , 379 n. 7 (1975), quoting Barlow v. Collins, 397 U.S. 159, 166 , 90 S.Ct.
Neujahr v. Ramsey County Civil Service Commission 370 N.W.2d 446 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370, 376
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370 , the court implied a right to a hearing from the public policy of the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act in order to subject the agency to review under MAPA, but simultaneously found the hearing provided the aggrieved party by the agency to be adequate.
MINN. VIKINGS FOOTBALL CLUB v. Metro. Council 289 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1979
Minnesota Public Research Interest Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, 306 Minn. 370 , Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 275 Minn. 107
No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 262 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1977
In MPIRG v. Minnesota EQC, 306 Minn. 370 , the court used federal case law to interpret MEPA.
Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst 256 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1977
Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst 256 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1977
Q. C., Minn., In re Northwestern Bell Tel.