Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 244 N.W.2d 648.

76 citing documents.

Cohen v. Appert 463 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Cohen v. Appert 463 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365 , (nondisclosure may constitute fraud when one party suppresses facts which he has a legal or equitable duty to communicate to the other party and which the other party is entitled to have communicated to her).
L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. 446 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1989
L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. 446 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1989
Richfield Bank & Trust v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365
Stowman v. Carlson Companies, Inc. 430 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Stowman v. Carlson Companies, Inc. 430 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365
Rap v. Bjp 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
R.A.P. v. B.J.P. 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rap v. Bjp 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365
R.A.P. v. B.J.P. 428 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365
Avery v. Solargizer International, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Avery v. Solargizer International, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
*682 Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365
State Bank of Hamburg v. Stoeckmann 417 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Bank of Hamburg v. Stoeckmann 417 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362 , for example, the court found that a bank employee fraudulently failed to disclose a depositor’s financial condition to a party obtaining a loan from the bank to purchase goods from the financially-troubled depositor.
Hurley v. TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. 414 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hurley v. TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. 414 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Richfield Bank and Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365
Simonsen v. BTH PROPERTIES 410 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Simonsen v. BTH PROPERTIES 410 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Richfield Bank and Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362 , our supreme court noted that nondisclosure may at times constitute fraud.
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365 , (quoting Thomas v. Murphy, 87 Minn. 358, 361 , 91 N.W.
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 377 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1985
The court of appeals, relying on Richfield Bank & *444 Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365 , apparently believed Gentile was under a duty to make some kind of disclosure.
MacKenzie v. Summit National Bank of St. Paul 363 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MacKenzie v. Summit National Bank of St. Paul 363 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Richfield Bank and Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362 , our supreme court noted that nondisclosure may at times constitute fraud.
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
While one party to a transaction generally need not disclose material facts to another party, “one who has special knowledge of material facts to which the other party does not have access may have a duty to disclose these facts to the other party.” Richfield Bank and Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 365 , (quoting Klein v. First Edina Nat.