Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cornfeldt v. Tongen, 262 N.W.2d 684.

153 citing documents.

Kohoutek v. Hafner 383 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1986
we joined the growing number of jurisdictions recognizing an action for negligent nondisclosure.
Riewe v. Arnesen 381 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Riewe v. Arnesen 381 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Clark v. Miller 378 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Clark v. Miller 378 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Schaffer 378 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Schaffer 378 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
tges was qualified to give his expert opinion regarding the point of impact and the location of the vehicles was a determination “peculiar within the province of the trial judge, whose ruling will not be reversed unless it is based on an erroneous view of the law or clearly not justified by the evidence.” ().
Wojciechowski v. William D. Stanley Shows, Inc. 378 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Wojciechowski v. William D. Stanley Shows, Inc. 378 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Whitney v. Buttrick 376 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Whitney v. Buttrick 376 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kalsbeck v. Westview Clinic, P.A. 375 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kalsbeck v. Westview Clinic, P.A. 375 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lundgren v. Eustermann 370 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1985
Lundgren v. Eustermann 370 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1985
Kohoutek v. Hafner 366 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kohoutek v. Hafner 366 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Since battery is an uncon-sented touching, the same issue of informed consent arises as in a claim of negligent nondisclosure
Dennie v. Metropolitan Medical Center 369 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dennie v. Metropolitan Medical Center 369 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of M.B.W. 364 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of M.B.W. 364 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Opinion testimony Whether the deputy sheriff was competent to testify as to his opinion regarding the point of impact is “peculiarly within the province of the trial judge, whose ruling will not be reversed unless it is based on an erroneous view of the law or clearly not justified by the evidence.”
Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. Skyline Family Medical Center 363 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. Skyline Family Medical Center 363 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Newmaster v. Mahmood 361 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Newmaster v. Mahmood 361 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lundgren v. Eustermann 356 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lundgren v. Eustermann 356 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The standards to be used in determining whether an expert should be allowed to testify as to a
Danielson v. Hanford 352 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Danielson v. Hanford 352 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
McCormack v. Lindberg 352 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
McCormack v. Lindberg 352 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The standards to be used in determining whether an expert should be allowed to testify as to a
Haas v. Gaviser 348 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Haas v. Gaviser 348 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cotroneo v. Pilney 343 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1984
Cotroneo v. Pilney 343 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1984
Gebhard v. Niedzwiecki, 265 Minn. 471, 478
Reinhardt v. Colton 337 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1983
Reinhardt v. Colton 337 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1983
-93 (Minn.1977) (quoting Pearce v. Linde, 113 Cal.App.2d 627, 629 , 248 P.2d 506, 508 (1952)).
Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota Hospitals 316 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1982
Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota Hospitals 316 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1982
We first recognized a cause of action for negligent nondisclosure of a (Cornfeldt I).
Kinikin v. Heupel 305 N.W.2d 589 Minn. 1981
Kinikin v. Heupel 305 N.W.2d 589 Minn. 1981
He claims battery is only appropriate where, (Cornfeldt I), the touching is of “a substantially different nature and character from that to which the patient consented.” Here, an adeno-mammectomy and a subcutaneous mastectomy are much the same and, by consenting to the former, the patient consented to the risk that a little more tissue might hav
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 295 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1980
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 295 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1980
Walton v. Jones 286 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1979
Walton v. Jones 286 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1979
Todd v. Eitel Hospital, 306 Minn. 254
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Kinning Ex Rel. Kinning v. Nelson 281 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1979
Kinning Ex Rel. Kinning v. Nelson 281 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1979
Smith v. Knowles 281 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1979