Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bellcourt, 251 N.W.2d 631.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ostrem, d at 921 ( (citing Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199, 93 S. Ct. 375, 382 (1972))).
A17-0357 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(citing State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263, 264, (citing Neil v. Biggers , 409 U.S. 188, 199 -200, 93 S. Ct. 375, 382 (1972))).
State of Minnesota v. Zakaria Abdinasser Yusuf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Zakaria Abdinasser Yusuf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Manson, 432 U.S. at 116, 97 S. Ct. at 2253-54; State v. Bellcourt, [312 Minn. 263, 265,]
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(citing State v. Belcourt, 312 Minn. 263, 264, ).
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263, 264
State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
State v. Lynch 590 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1999
This court has “been *81 flexible in applying this ‘test’ on appeal, upholding admission notwithstanding a lack of closeness in time or place if the relevance of the evidence was otherwise clear.” DeBaere, d at 305 ( State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263 , ).
State v. Kennedy 585 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1998
State v. Kennedy 585 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1998
( State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263 , ).
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
State v. Jones 556 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1996
State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263
State v. Ostrem 535 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1995
State v. Ostrem 535 N.W.2d 916 Minn. 1995
at 2253-54 ; State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263
State v. Myers 413 N.W.2d 122 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Myers 413 N.W.2d 122 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
A photo display cannot be so suggestive it creates “a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.” State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263, 264
State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263, 264
State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263, 265-66
State v. DeBaere 356 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1984
State v. DeBaere 356 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1984
See, e.g., State v. Matteson, supra; State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263
State v. Scott 323 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1982
State v. Scott 323 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1982
In State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263 , we upheld the admission of evidence of other crimes even though they were committed 170 miles away from the crime charged because the evidence was highly relevant.
State v. Cavegn 294 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1980
State v. Cavegn 294 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1980
See, e. g., State v. Nordin, 297 Minn. 495 , State v. Bellcourt, 312 Minn. 263
State v. Michaud 276 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1979
State v. Michaud 276 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1979
State v. Bellcourt, Minn.