Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McKee v. Likins, 261 N.W.2d 566.

76 citing documents.

Contested Case of Christian Nursing Center v. Department of Human Services 419 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Commerce 402 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Commerce 402 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
4 (1986) defines an administrative rule to mean “every agency statement of general applicability arid future affect * * * adopted to implement or make specific the law enforced or administered by it or to govern its organization or procedure.” the Commissioner of Public Welfare circulated a bulletin regarding the scope of benefits under the State’s medical assistance program.
Handle With Care, Inc. v. Department of Human Services 393 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Handle With Care, Inc. v. Department of Human Services 393 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The test for standing to challenge a rule under the above language is whether a petitioner has demonstrated “injury in fact.” (citing Snyders Drug Stores v. Minnesota Board of Pharmacy, 301 Minn. 28, 32 , ).
Northern Messenger, Inc. v. Airport Couriers, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northern Messenger, Inc. v. Airport Couriers, Inc. 359 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
at 801 (Minn.Ct.App.1984); -78 (Minn.1977).
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Senior Citizens Coalition of Northeastern Minnesota v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 355 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1984
Senior Citizens Coalition of Northeastern Minnesota v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 355 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1984
Stony Ridge & Carlos View Terrace Ass'n v. Alexander 353 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Stony Ridge & Carlos View Terrace Ass'n v. Alexander 353 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wenzel v. Meeker County Welfare Board 346 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Wenzel v. Meeker County Welfare Board 346 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-243 (Minn.1980); -578 (Minn.1977).
Swenson v. State, Department of Public Welfare 329 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1983
Swenson v. State, Department of Public Welfare 329 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1983
Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Novak 295 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1980
Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Novak 295 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1980
5 Interpretive rules fall within the statutory definition of “rule.” -8 (Minn.1977).
Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. State 279 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1979
Minnesota-Dakotas Retail Hardware Ass'n v. State 279 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1979
we observed three definite types of administrative agency rules: procedural, legislative and interpretative.
Minnesota Medical Ass'n v. State 274 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1978
Dakota County Welfare Board v. State, Department of Public Welfare 261 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1977
Mower County Welfare Board v. State, Department of Public Welfare 261 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1977
Dakota County Welfare Board v. State, Department of Public Welfare 261 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1977
*566 We are holding in the cases of McKee v. Likins, Minn., and Mower County Welfare Bd.
Mower County Welfare Board v. State, Department of Public Welfare 261 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1977
That question has been resolved by our decisions in McKee v. Likins, Minn., and Dakota County Welfare Bd.