Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 249 N.W.2d 168.

171 citing documents.

Marriage of Schumm v. Schumm 510 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Schumm v. Schumm 510 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83 , -72 (1976).
Marriage of Abbott v. Abbott 481 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Abbott v. Abbott 481 N.W.2d 864 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
52.01; Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82 , Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267
Marriage of Otto v. Otto 472 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Otto v. Otto 472 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
for rev. denied (Minn. May 30, 1990), (citing Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82 , ).
County of Pine v. Petersen 453 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
County of Pine v. Petersen 453 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield 452 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield 452 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
ate, the golden thread running through any best interests analysis is the importance, for a young child in particular, of its bond with the primary parent as this relationship bears on the other criteria, such as the need for “a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity” and “the mental and physical health of all individuals involved.” Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 81 , -71 (1976).
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 428 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 428 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
1.” See Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
Wilkins Dodge, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp. 426 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Wilkins Dodge, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp. 426 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83 , (“It is sufficient if the findings as a whole reflect that the trial court has taken the statutory factors into consideration, in so far as they are relevant, in reaching its decision.”).
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 424 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 424 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83 , -172 (1976).
Marriage of Sullivan v. Allen 419 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Sullivan v. Allen 419 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
Marriage of Lewis v. Lewis 414 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lewis v. Lewis 414 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82 , (particularized findings necessary in setting the amount and duration of maintenance); pet for rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Veit v. Veit 413 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Veit v. Veit 413 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
Marriage of Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 410 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Roehrdanz v. Roehrdanz 410 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83 , -72 (1976).
Marraige of Hellerstedt v. Hellerstedt 409 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marraige of Hellerstedt v. Hellerstedt 409 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosen-feld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 408 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83 , -72 (1976).
Hall v. Hall 408 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thomas v. Fey 405 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thomas v. Fey 405 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-27 (Minn.1978); Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 79-80
Marriage of Lees v. Lees 404 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lees v. Lees 404 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 403 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kennedy v. Kennedy 403 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82-83 , -72 (1976).
Marriage of Reyes v. Schmidt 403 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Reyes v. Schmidt 403 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Particularized findings are necessary to “facilitate appellate review, to ensure that prescribed standards are utilized by the trial court, and to satisfy the parties that an important question is fairly considered and decided by the trial court.” Bjerke, d at 252 (citing Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82 , ).
In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Amitad, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Gillis v. Gillis 400 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Gillis v. Gillis 400 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76 , (mem.).
In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Amitad, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
Marriage of Coakley v. Coakley 400 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Coakley v. Coakley 400 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82 , (particularized findings promote the use of statutory standards, explain the trial court’s decision for the parties, and facilitate meaningful appellate review).
Marriage of Ulrich v. Ulrich 400 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Ulrich v. Ulrich 400 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
In Re the Custody of N.M.O. 399 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(findings are necessary to demonstrate court considered statutory factors); Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 81-82 , -72 (1976) (findings assure parties this important decision was fairly and carefully considered); Wallin, 290 Minn. at 267 , d at 631 (findings made in the exercise of broad discretion must be set forth with a high degree of particularity if appellate review is to be meaningful).
Marriage of Schaapveld v. Schaapveld 398 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Schaapveld v. Schaapveld 398 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bjerke, d at 252 (citing Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 82
Marriage of Kujawa v. Kujawa 397 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1986