DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Knaffla, 243 N.W.2d 737.

850 citing documents.

  • Ademodi v. State 616 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2000
  • Ademodi v. State 616 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2000
    “[W]here direct appeal has once been taken, all matters raised therein, and all claims known but not raised, will not be considered upon a subsequent petition for postconvietion relief.” State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Wayne v. State 601 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
  • Wayne v. State 601 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1999
    See State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
  • Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
    We have previously held that the rule enunciated in State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , which generally precludes postconviction consideration of all issues known or raised at the time of direct appeal, applies to claims for ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • Gassler v. State 590 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1999
  • Gassler v. State 590 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1999
    Once a defendant has had a direct appeal, “all matters raised therein, and all claims known but not raised, will not be considered upon a subsequent petition for postconviction relief.” State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Steinbuch v. State 589 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1999
  • Steinbuch v. State 589 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1999
    3 (1996); State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , 243 *).
  • Zenanko v. State 587 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1998
  • Zenanko v. State 587 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1998
    Once a defendant has had a direct appeal, “all matters raised therein, and all claims known but not raised, will not be considered upon a subsequent petition for postconviction relief.” State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
    Cf. State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , (stating that if a defendant takes a direct appeal he may not thereafter raise in a postconviction proceeding any matter which he raised on direct appeal or which he knew at that time but did not raise).
  • Flournoy v. State 583 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1998
  • Kambon v. State 583 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1998
  • Flournoy v. State 583 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1998
  • Kambon v. State 583 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1998
    State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
  • Townsend v. State 582 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1998
  • Townsend v. State 582 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1998
  • Wilson v. State 582 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1998
    State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Sutherlin v. State 574 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1998
  • Sutherlin v. State 574 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1998
    State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , see also Minn.Stat.
  • Robinson v. State 567 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
  • Robinson v. State 567 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
    State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Hale v. State 566 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1997
  • Hale v. State 566 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1997
    (citing State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , ).
  • Rainer v. State 566 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1997
  • Rainer v. State 566 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1997
    -84 (Minn.1995); (citing State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , ).
  • King v. State 562 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1997
  • King v. State 562 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1997
    State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Russell v. State 562 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1997
  • Russell v. State 562 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1997
    State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , see also Mmn.Stat.
  • Black v. State 560 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1997
  • Black v. State 560 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1997
    State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
  • Rairdon v. State 557 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1996
    See State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Roby v. State 547 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1996
  • Roby v. State 547 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1996
    See also State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , (all matters raised on direct appeal, or all claims known but not raised, will not be considered in a subsequent petition for posteonviction relief).
  • State v. Kelly 535 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Kelly 535 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1995
    Kelly's original petition asserted as a basis for relief certain jury instruction issues which the postconviction court did not specifically address, but which are procedurally barred by our holding in State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Miller v. State 531 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1995
  • Miller v. State 531 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1995
    Furthermore, “[w]here direct appeal has once been taken, all matters raised therein, and all claims known but not raised, will not be considered upon a subsequent petition for postconviction relief.” (citing State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , ).
  • Roby v. State 531 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1995
  • Roby v. State 531 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1995
    (citing State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , ).
  • Johnson v. State 528 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1995
  • Johnson v. State 528 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1995
    “[W]here [a] direct appeal has once been taken, all matters raised therein, and all claims known but not raised, will not be considered upon a subsequent petition for post-conviction relief.” State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252
  • Crisler v. State 520 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • Crisler v. State 520 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    ANALYSIS I. The supreme court has held that “where direct appeal has once been taken, all matters raised therein, and all claims known but not raised, will not be considered upon a subsequent petition for postconviction relief.” State v. Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 252 , see also, (under Knaffla , postconviction claims that were previously raised need not be considered).