DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Peterson, 242 N.W.2d 88.

72 citing documents.

  • McCarthy v. McCarthy 344 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1984
    The district court was aware of our decisions in Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297 , and Berg v. Berg, 309 Minn. 281 , but said, “Except for custody cases, this Court intends to follow Rule 53.05(2) and to apply the clearly erroneous test until and unless the Supreme Court directs otherwise.” We so direct.
  • State on Behalf of Gunderson v. Preuss 336 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1983
  • State on Behalf of Gunderson v. Preuss 336 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1983
    See Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297, 307
  • Auge v. Auge 334 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1983
  • Auge v. Auge 334 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1983
    Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297, 307
  • Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-Petersen 310 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1981
  • Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-Petersen 310 N.W.2d 471 Minn. 1981
    Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297, 308
  • Myhervold v. Myhervold 271 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1978
  • Myhervold v. Myhervold 271 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1978
    See, Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83 , Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297, 308 , Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 266
  • Griffin v. Van Griffin 267 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1978
  • Griffin v. Van Griffin 267 N.W.2d 733 Minn. 1978
    Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297
  • In Re the Welfare of C. W. S. 267 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1978
  • Beaudet v. Beaudet 263 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1978
  • Beaudet v. Beaudet 263 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1978
    Therefore, this Court adopts such Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order and denies the plaintiff’s motion.” The dispositive issue on plaintiff’s appeal from the district court’s order is whether the district judge made that “informed and independent” review of the referee’s proposed findings, conclusions, and order in conformity with the mandate of Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297, 304
  • Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
  • Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
    Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297
  • Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
  • Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
    Collateral issues are whether the referee erred in refusing to grant defendant a 3-day evidentiary hearing on his petition to terminate alimony, and whether the approval and adoption of the referee’s findings in the absence of a transcript of defendant’s oral testimony violated our holding in Peterson v. Peterson, Minn.
  • Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 249 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1976
  • Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 249 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1976
    In Peterson v. Peterson, 308 *80 Minn. 297, 304, we adhered to the rule established in LaBelle, specifically holding: “* * * [A] 11 recommended findings and orders of a family court referee in custody matters are advisory only and possess no more than prima facie validity.
  • Berg v. Berg 244 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1976
  • Berg v. Berg 244 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1976
    This issue was thoroughly considered and decided otherwise In Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297 , *285