Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Feia v. St. Cloud State College, 244 N.W.2d 635.

30 citing documents.

Aristotle R. Trinity, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Aristotle R. Trinity, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cloud State Coll., 309 Minn. 564, 564
Prickett v. Circuit Science, Inc. 499 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Prickett v. Circuit Science, Inc. 499 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564, 565
Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training 499 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training 499 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564, 565
McCourtney v. Imprimis Technology, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
McCourtney v. Imprimis Technology, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564 , the court summarized the Tilseth definition of misconduct as “conduct evincing a willful or wanton disregard for the employer’s interests or conduct demonstrating a lack of concern by the employee for her job.” Id.
Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 448 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 448 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
Cloud *525 State College, 309 Minn. 564, 565
Eyler v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. 427 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Eyler v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. 427 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564, 565 , pet.
Monyoro v. Marriott Corp. 403 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Monyoro v. Marriott Corp. 403 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564, 565
Gerr v. Target-Fridley 382 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gerr v. Target-Fridley 382 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564 , the Minnesota Supreme Court also indicated that misconduct may encompass actions “demonstrating a lack of concern by the employee for her job.” Id.
Fresonke v. St. Mary's Hospital 363 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fresonke v. St. Mary's Hospital 363 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jones v. Rosemount, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jones v. Rosemount, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564, 565 , the Supreme Court expanded the definition to include conduct “demonstrating a lack of concern by the employee for her job.” This court has recognized the employer’s right to establish and enforce reasonable work rules relating to absenteeism.
Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor Outlet 346 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1984
Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor Outlet 346 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1984
King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564 , expanded the definition of misconduct to include any actions that demonstrate a lack of concern for one’s job, and in Group Health Plan, (Minn.Ct.App., Dec.
Auger v. Gillette Co. 303 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1981
Auger v. Gillette Co. 303 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1981
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564 , Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Center, Inc., 296 Minn. 240
Moeller v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 281 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1979
Moeller v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 281 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1979
Cloud State College, 309 Minn. 564 , Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Center, Inc., 296 Minn. 240
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1977
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1977
Cloud State College, Minn.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by