Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 245 N.W.2d 235.

42 citing documents.

Schmuckler v. Creurer 585 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Schmuckler v. Creurer 585 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See, e.g., Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48, 51
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(citing Kuehl v. Nat’l Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48, 50 , ).
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48, 50
Vacinek v. First National Bank of Pine City 416 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vacinek v. First National Bank of Pine City 416 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48, 50
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48, 50
State v. Kipp 384 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Kipp 384 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See State v. Luciow, 308 Minn. 6 , (no appeal as of right lies from an order determining that probable cause existed for a search); State v. Hardin, 294 Minn. 556 , (no appeal lies from an order denying a defendant’s motion to dismiss a complaint); State v. Dailson, 286 Minn. 549 , (no appeal as of rig
High Forest Truck Stop, Inc. v. LaCrosse Petroleum Equipment Co. 364 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
High Forest Truck Stop, Inc. v. LaCrosse Petroleum Equipment Co. 364 N.W.2d 810 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kuehl v. National Tea Company, 310 Minn. 48, 50
Coughlin v. LaBounty 354 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Coughlin v. LaBounty 354 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48
Nelson v. Smith 349 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Smith 349 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48, 50
Fallin v. Maplewood-North St. Paul District No. 622 348 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fallin v. Maplewood-North St. Paul District No. 622 348 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48
Gordon v. Hoffman 303 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1981
Gordon v. Hoffman 303 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1981
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48
Peterson v. Sorlien 299 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1980
Peterson v. Sorlien 299 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1980
In light of our examination of the record and rules of construction providing that upon review the evidence must be viewed in a manner most favorable to the prevailing party, Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48 , we find that a reasonable basis existed for the verdict exonerating defendants of the charge of false imprisonment.
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
Kuehl v. Nat’l Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48, 50 , Gilbert v. Brindle, 306 Minn. 569, 570
Salmen v. City of St. Paul 281 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1979
Salmen v. City of St. Paul 281 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1979
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48
Syrovatka v. State 278 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1979
Syrovatka v. State 278 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1979
State v. Luciow, 308 Minn. 6
Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 274 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1979
Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 274 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1979
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48
Hughes v. Dakota County 278 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1978
Hughes v. Dakota County 278 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 1978
The prosecution, on the authority of State v. Luciow, 308 Minn. 6 , d *45 833, ultimately dropped all charges against McClure rather than reveal the identity of the confidential informant.
Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co. 270 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1978
Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co. 270 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1978
Appellants’ task in this appeal is a difficult one because (1) the evidence and inferences must be viewed in the light most favorable to the jury, Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48 , and (2) the question of proximate cause is for the jury unless the evidence is so clear as to leave no room for differences of opinion among reasonable persons.
Norberg v. Northwestern Hospital Ass'n, Inc. 270 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1978
Norberg v. Northwestern Hospital Ass'n, Inc. 270 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1978
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., 310 Minn. 48
Berg v. Wiley 264 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1978
Berg v. Wiley 264 N.W.2d 145 Minn. 1978
Kuehl v. National Tea Co., Minn.
State v. Causey 257 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1977
State v. Causey 257 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1977
Defendant had the opportunity to explore the factual basis of the affidavit’s contents at a Rasmussen hearing, granted by the court below prior to our decision in State v. Luciow, Minn.