DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of St. Paul v. Froysland, 246 N.W.2d 435.

36 citing documents.

  • State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
  • Distinguished State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 275
  • State v. J.Y.M. 711 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. JYM 711 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. J.Y.M. 711 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 275-76 , (concluding that statute was not intended to protect those who pleaded guilty and that “innocence, which would ordinarily be concluded from acquittal or dismissal of charges, does not result when ...
  • State v. JYM 711 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 275-76 , (concluding that statute was not intended to protect those who pleaded guilty and that "innocence, which would ordinarily be concluded from acquittal or dismissal of charges, does not result when ...
  • State v. A.C.H. 710 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Ach 710 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Ach 710 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 276 , -10 (Minn.App.1989) (stating that where a defendant pleaded guilty, the district court stayed the imposition of her sentence, and eventually her conviction was vacated and dismissed, defendant was not entitled to expungement), review denie
  • State v. A.C.H. 710 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 276 , -10 (Minn.App.1989) (stating that where a defendant pleaded guilty, the district court stayed the imposition of her sentence, and eventually her conviction was vacated and dismissed, defendant was not entitled to expungement), review denie
  • State v. C.P.H. 707 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. CPH 707 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. C.P.H. 707 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. CPH 707 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Schultz 676 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Schultz 676 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    at 259 (concluding that the term “in favor of’ “includes verdicts of not guilty and voluntary dismissals, and does not include resolutions where the defendant pleaded guilty”); City of St Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 275-76 , (concluding that the statute was not intended to protect those who pleaded guilty).
  • State v. Davisson 624 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Davisson 624 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Ohrt 619 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State v. Ohrt 619 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 269
  • State, City of Maple Grove v. Horner 617 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • State, City of Maple Grove v. Horner 617 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 272-76 , -39 (1976), interpreting a prior statute, Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Ambaye 616 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Ambaye 616 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 2000
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268 , 272-76 -39 (1976).
  • State v. M.B.M. 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. MBM 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. M.B.M. 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268 , (holding that a dismissal of charges after a stay of imposition of sentence is not a determination in favor of accused); see also C.A., d at 357 n. 3 (charges dismissed after first conviction set aside was a determination in favor of accused); R.L.F., d at 805-806 (pretri
  • State v. MBM 518 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268 , (holding that a dismissal of charges after a stay of imposition of sentence is not a determination in favor of accused); see also C.A., d at 357 n. 3 (charges dismissed after first conviction set aside was a determination in favor of accused); R.L.F., d at 805-806 (pretri
  • State v. LK 359 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. L.K. 359 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. L.K. 359 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 275
  • State v. LK 359 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268, 275
  • State v. C. A. 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
  • State v. CA 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
  • State v. CA 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268 , 275 n.5, , 439 n.5 (1976), section 299C.11 does not apply to " all records relating to arrest" (emphasis added).
  • State v. C. A. 304 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1981
    Paul v. Froysland, 310 Minn. 268 , 275 n.5, , 439 n.5 (1976), section 299C.11 does not apply to “all records relating to arrest” (emphasis added).