Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Minne…, 251 N.W.2d 620.

29 citing documents.

ROA Rochester, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In & For City of Minneapolis, see also Prior Lake Am.
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 319
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 318-19, (explaining that the court adopted the code of professional responsibility pursuant to its authority to regulate the practice of law); Petition for Integration of Bar of Minn., 216 Minn. 195, 199, (stating “the making of regulations and rules governing
Brainerd Daily Dispatch v. Dehen 693 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brainerd Daily Dispatch v. Dehen 693 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 323 , (HRA).
Free Press v. County of Blue Earth 677 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Free Press v. County of Blue Earth 677 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 324 , (concluding that attorney-client privilege exception to open meeting law applied when affidavit showed that closed meetings were necessary to protect litigation strategy and discuss settlement proposals in case pending in United States District Court); Channel 10 v. Indep.
State v. Gianakos 644 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 2002
State v. Gianakos 644 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 2002
of Minneapolis, 310 Minn. 313, 320 , (citation and quotation omitted).
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 323 , (hereinafter HRA).
Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL 507 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Star Tribune v. BD. OF EDUC., SP. SCHOOL 507 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 324 , [hereinafter HRA]; see Note, The Minnesota Open Meeting Law After Twenty Years —A Look, 5 Wm.
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 505 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1993
State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of Hennepin 505 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1993
The court of appeals considered Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Auth., 310 Minn. 313 , on which the County and City relied, but determined that the proposed settlement conference could not be excepted under the attorney-client privilege because its purpose was not to obtain legal advice from counsel and because there would be no need for absolute confidentiality from opposing pa
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. Turnham 486 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1992
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. Turnham 486 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1992
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 318
Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of Saint Paul 435 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Northwest Publications, Inc. v. City of Saint Paul 435 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 310 Minn. 313 , (HRA).
The Minnesota Daily v. University of Minnesota 432 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The Minnesota Daily v. University of Minnesota 432 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 310 Minn. 313
Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
He points to Minneapolis Star & Tribune v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Minneapolis, 310 Minn. 313 , {HRA), in which the court recognized an attorney-client privilege exception to the Open Meeting Law despite the absence of a statute expressly authorizing the exception.
St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community Schools 332 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1983
St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community Schools 332 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1983
In Minneapolis Star and Tribune Co. v. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Minneapolis, 310 Minn. 313 , the court stated: The attorney-client exception discussed herein would almost never extend to the mere request for general legal advice or opinion by a public body in its capacity as a public agency.
Kahl v. Minnesota Wood Specialty, Inc. 277 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1979
Kahl v. Minnesota Wood Specialty, Inc. 277 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1979
We observed in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. H. R. A., 310 Minn. 313 , that, as a barrier to testimonial disclosure, the privilege tends to suppress relevant facts and must be strictly construed.