Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Spencer, 248 N.W.2d 915.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Larry Joe Foster Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Larry Joe Foster Minn. 2025
(addressing whether “[a] witness’[s] refusal to answer otherwise permissible questions on Fifth Amendment grounds .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
to protect the witness’ privilege against self-incrimination by preventing cross-examination in areas which could invade [their] constitutional protection under the Fifth Amendment.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2016
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2016
See State v. Spencer, 311 Minn. 222, 228-29
State v. Johnson 679 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Johnson 679 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Spencer, 311 Minn. 222, 230-31
State v. Naylor 474 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1991
State v. Naylor 474 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1991
State v. Spencer, 311 Minn. 222 , cf Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23-24 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. White 411 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. White 411 N.W.2d 196 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Spencer, 311 Minn. 222, 230
State v. Rose 353 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Rose 353 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See generally State v. Spencer, 311 Minn. 222, 230
State v. Earnest 293 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1980
State v. Earnest 293 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1980
See, State v. Spencer, 311 Minn. 222
State v. Moose 266 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1978
State v. Moose 266 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1978
State v. Spencer, Minn., Royal v. State of Maryland, 529 F.2d 1280, 1283 (4 Cir. 1976); Johnson v. Johnson, 375 F.Supp.
State v. Simmons 258 N.W.2d 908 Minn. 1977
State v. Seifert 256 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1977
State v. Hill 256 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1977
State v. Seifert 256 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1977
State v. Hill 256 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1977
The first statement in the context in which it was made did not suggest to the jurors or prospective jurors that they draw an adverse inference if defendant failed to testify —see, State v. Spencer, Minn., —and, in any event, defendant did testify.
State v. Zaitz 254 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1977
State v. Zaitz 254 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1977
State v. Master 252 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1977
State v. Master 252 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1977
See, State v. Spencer, 311 Minn. 222