46293 Precedential Affirmed Processed

State v. Martinez

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed December 3, 1976 · 248 N.W.2d 722

Cited by

State v. Roy 928 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2019
State v. Roy 920 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Thunder 605 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Anderson v. Beaulieu 555 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Custody of K.K.S. 508 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bailey v. State 409 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Desjarlait v. Desjarlait 379 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Porter 348 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State Ex Rel. Minnesota State Ethical Practices Board v. Red Lake DFL Committee 303 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1981
Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc. 281 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1979

Opinion text

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument. Per Curiam. Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of attempted burglary with a tool, Minn. St. 609.17 and 609.58, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 10 years’ imprisonment. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence of his guilt to justify the verdict, that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence and in making certain instructions, that the prosecutor committed misconduct, and that defense counsel did not represent him adequately. No useful purpose would be served by our discussing these issues in detail. Suffice it to say, we have carefully considered all of these issues and find they are without merit. Affirmed.