Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc., 252 N.W.2d 107.

139 citing documents.

Gilchrist v. Perl 387 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1986
4 Plaintiff Klein and the trial court next contend that when a fiduciary commits a breach of trust, the fiduciary must pay the attorney fees expended in curing that breach, citing Tarnowski v. Resop, 236 Minn. 33 , and Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324
Anderson v. Sommer 381 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Anderson v. Sommer 381 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324 , the court said: In order for a contract to be specifically enforced, * * * the law requires merely that the parties’ intent as to the fundamental terms of the contract can be ascertained with reasonable certainty.
Marriage of Maskrey v. Maskrey 380 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Maskrey v. Maskrey 380 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Although traditionally indemnity has been viewed as a right arising out of a contract, “the award of indemnity should follow traditional concepts of equity.” Hill v. Okay Construction Company, Inc., 312 Minn. 324, 345
Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeder's Ass'n 374 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeder's Ass'n 374 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, Hill v. Okay Construction Co., 312 Minn. 324 , (emphasis added).
Whitney v. Buttrick 376 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Whitney v. Buttrick 376 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hill v. Okay Constr., 312 Minn. 324
Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co. 374 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co. 374 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hill v. Okay Construction Co., 312 Minn. 324, 347
Allum v. MedCenter Health Care, Inc. 371 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Allum v. MedCenter Health Care, Inc. 371 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Hill v. Okay Construction Company, Inc., 312 Minn. 324, 345
Kohoutek v. Hafner 366 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kohoutek v. Hafner 366 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Although trial courts have broad discretion in determining the form of interrogatories in a special verdict, Hill v. Okay Construction Co., 312 Minn. 324, 340 , they should define the terms employed in the interrogatories.
Spannaus v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, & Lindgren, Ltd. 368 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Spannaus v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, & Lindgren, Ltd. 368 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324, 337
Logefeil v. Logefeil 367 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Logefeil v. Logefeil 367 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Similarly, in Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324, 346 , the court implicitly held that service of a cross-claim for indemnification does not constitute tender of the defense, a condition precedent for recovering attorney’s fees from an indemnitor.
Lundeen v. Lappi 361 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Persgard v. Gordon C. Carroll & Sons, Inc. 362 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lundeen v. Lappi 361 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hill v. Okay Construction Co., 312 Minn. 324
Persgard v. Gordon C. Carroll & Sons, Inc. 362 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hill v. Okay Construction Company, 312 Minn. 324, 340
Sabasko v. Fletcher 359 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sabasko v. Fletcher 359 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hill v. Okay Construction Co., 312 Minn. 324 , -18 (1977).
Zobel & Dahl Construction v. Crotty 356 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1984
Zobel & Dahl Construction v. Crotty 356 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1984
Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324, 340
Johnson v. City of Jordan 352 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johnson v. City of Jordan 352 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324
Autrey v. Trkla 350 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Autrey v. Trkla 350 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Hill v. Okay Construction Company, Inc., 312 Minn. 324, 340 , the court held that the special verdict must encompass all questions of material fact “to ensure the parties their constitutionally guaranteed right to a jury trial.” The defendants contend that because no right to a jury trial exists in a dissolution case, Olson cannot now claim the
Pomush v. McGroarty 285 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1979
Pomush v. McGroarty 285 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1979
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc., 312 Minn. 324, 340
First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco 276 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco 276 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
ed in Dworsky v. Vermes Credit Jewelry, Inc., 244 Minn. 62, 70 , — “ * * * where the wrongful act of the defendant thrusts the plaintiff into litigation with a third person, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant the expenses incurred in conducting the litigation against the third party, including attorneys’ fees.” See also Hill v. Okay Construction Co., Inc., Minn. Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127 , 196 N.W.
Gravley v. Sea Gull Marine, Inc. 269 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1978
Gravley v. Sea Gull Marine, Inc. 269 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1978
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Minn.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by