DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Florence, 239 N.W.2d 892.

117 citing documents.

  • State v. Diedrich 410 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Diedrich 410 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442, 457
  • Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W. 407 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Matter of the Welfare of R.D.W. 407 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    In State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442 , the supreme court stated that a carefully drawn and sufficiently detailed complaint made by investigating officers and incorporating reliable hearsay may in some limited situations be adequate to support probable cause, at least if the essential truth of the facts alleged in the probable cause
  • State v. Fadden 397 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Fadden 397 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442, 457
  • State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Grose 387 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    This Court is also mindful of the holding in State v. Florence [ 306 Minn. 442 ]
  • In Re the Welfare of T.S.E. 379 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of T.S.E. 379 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Rule 11.03 of the Criminal Rules permits a Florence hearing on probable cause, see State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442 , and provides that a finding of probable cause shall be based upon “the entire record including reliable hearsay in whole or in part.” The trial court’s finding of probable cause in reliance on the petitions and police reports was not clearly erroneous.
  • State v. Rud 359 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Rud 359 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1984
    In State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442 , we held that (a) the adversarial preliminary hearing previously required by statute became obsolete upon the adoption of Rule 11.03, (b) the probable cause hearing provided by Rule 11.03 was not intended to serve as a substitute for discovery, which is governed primarily by Rule 9, and (c) gen
  • State v. Rud 352 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Rud 352 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Similarly, this court is not asked to determine whether the defense has triggered the substantial admissible evidence rule of State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442, 444
  • State v. Olkon 299 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Terrell 283 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Terrell 283 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1979
    The trial court, erroneously relying on State v. Florence, 306 Minn. 442 , which dealt with the issue of probable cause to support a complaint, ruled that the state could rely on the transcript without calling the witnesses.