Wing v. Control Data Corp.
The holding in the court’s own words
We hold that the board’s finding that employer did not have actual knowledge is reasonably supported by substantial evidence.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1987
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Notch v. Victory Granite Co. 238 N.W.2d 426
- Greene v. W & W GENERATOR REBUILDERS 224 N.W.2d 157
- Kling v. St. Barnabas Hospital 291 Minn. 257
- 175 N.W.2d 674 not in our corpus
- Pojanowski v. Hart 288 Minn. 77
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying compensation. The only issue raised is whether employer had actual knowledge of the employee’s injury so as to satisfy the notice requirement of either Minn.St.1971, § 176.141 or § 176.664. We hold that the board’s finding that employer did not have actual knowledge is reasonably supported by substantial evidence. See, Kling v. St. Barnabas Hospital, 291 Minn. 257 , 190 *175 N.W.2d 674 (1971); Pojanowski v. Hart, 288 Minn. 77 , 178 N.W.2d 913 (1970). Affirmed.