Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Greer v. Kooiker, 253 N.W.2d 133.

67 citing documents.

  • Better Homes & Gardens v. Bittmann 357 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 510
  • Handy v. Garmaker 324 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1982
  • Handy v. Garmaker 324 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1982
    ES SELLER©: By /s/ Richard E. Garmaker By /s/ Patrick M. Handy By /s/ Patricia A. Handy By /s/ Edith M. Handy The dissent seems to adopt the view that because of the limited purpose of the agency no fiduciary relation existed between Garmaker and Handy and that it was therefore proper for Garmaker to represent both parties without revealing that information to the seller, citing Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499
  • Bouten v. Richard Miller Homes, Inc. 321 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1982
  • Bouten v. Richard Miller Homes, Inc. 321 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1982
    7 In Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499 , we stated that in order to satisfy the Statute of Frauds there must be a writing containing (1) a statement of the consideration; (2) an adequate description of the parties; (3) an adequate description of the land; (4) the general terms and conditions of the transaction; and (5) subscription b
  • Gartner v. Eikill 319 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1982
  • Gartner v. Eikill 319 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1982
    See, e.g., N&D Fashions, Inc. v. DHJ Industries, Inc., 548 F.2d 722 (8th Cir. 1976); Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499
  • Schwinn v. Griffith 303 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1981
  • Schwinn v. Griffith 303 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1981
    While respondent argues that oral contracts within the statute of frauds are rendered “void,” the recent decisions of this court have made it clear that the word “void” in the statute will be interpreted to mean “voidable.” Royal Realty Co. v. Levin, 244 Minn. 288, 292-94 , -72 (1955); see Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499 , 505 n.2, , 138 n.2 (1977);.
  • Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe 291 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1980
  • Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe 291 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1980
    E. g., Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499
  • Malevich v. Hakola 278 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1979
  • Malevich v. Hakola 278 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1979
  • Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc. 278 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1979
  • Hehl v. Estate of Klotter 277 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1979
  • Hehl v. Estate of Klotter 277 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1979
    We acknowledge that this rule may be inconsistent with our decisions in Greer v. Kooiker, Minn., and Western Land Assn. v. Banks, 80 Minn. 317 , 83 N.W.
  • Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc. 278 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1979
    Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499 , In re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore Properties, 308 Minn. 221 , In re Estate of Balafas, 293 Minn. 94