Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Widell, 258 N.W.2d 795.

60 citing documents.

  • Collins v. State 385 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Collins v. State 385 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Abbott 356 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Abbott 356 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1984
    1682, 1688 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980), but was a spontaneous, volunteered statement made while police were asking routine booking questions
  • State v. Link 289 N.W.2d 102 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Link 289 N.W.2d 102 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Corarito 268 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Corarito 268 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1978
    Minnesota cases applying this test include State v. Widell, Minn., State v. Knox, Minn.
  • State v. Hamilton 268 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Hamilton 268 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1978
    We adopted this standard in State v. Widell, Minn., though our cases prior to Wingo also looked to these factors, particularly the presence or absence of prejudice to the defendant.