Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fitzer v. Bloom, 253 N.W.2d 395.

43 citing documents.

Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Independent School District No. 622 v. Keene Corp. 495 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Green v. City of Coon Rapids 485 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Green v. City of Coon Rapids 485 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
MN. PERSONAL INJURY ABESTOS v. Keene 481 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1992
MN. PERSONAL INJURY ABESTOS v. Keene 481 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1992
Simchuk v. Fullerton, 299 Minn. 91
Gaughan v. Gaughan 450 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Gaughan v. Gaughan 450 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pagel 439 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pagel 439 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Western Fire Insurance Co. v. Persons 393 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Western Fire Insurance Co. v. Persons 393 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Coughlin v. Radosevich 372 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Coughlin v. Radosevich 372 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the court did not allow a recovery for “other” pecuniary losses under the version of the Dram Shop Act that is applicable to this case.
Krueger v. Nordstrom 367 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Krueger v. Nordstrom 367 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
( and Sandt v. Hylen, 301 Minn. 475
Holmquist v. Miller 367 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1985
Holmquist v. Miller 367 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1985
Since Trail has been rendered impotent, to the common-law action prompted by Trail is now irrelevant.
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Knese v. Heidgerken 358 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Knese v. Heidgerken 358 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
However, because the Act is also penal in nature and has no counterpart in the common law, its provisions “cannot be enlarged by construction beyond the meaning given in clear and explicit terms.” citing Hartwig v. The Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246, 253 Minn. 347 , and Beck v. Groe.
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
: Since the legislature has provided a remedy for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor in the Civil Damage Act, the legislature has preempted the field and has provided the exclusive remedy in the act.
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
Hannah v. Chmielewski, Inc. 323 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1982
Hannah v. Chmielewski, Inc. 323 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1982
Bakke v. Rainbow Club, Inc., 306 Minn. 99
Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Because “loss of support” is not equivalent to “pecuniary loss,” damages recoverable under the Dram Shop Act are more restrictive than damages awardable *731 under the Wrongful Death Act.
Wegan v. Village of Lexington 309 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1981
Parr v. Cloutier 297 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1980
Parr v. Cloutier 297 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1980
Sandt v. Hylen, 301 Minn. 475
Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
Thereafter, we were faced with the issue of whether a common-law claim for negligence was proper where an action under the Civil Damage Act could be maintained.
Seeley Ex Rel. Seeley v. Sobczak 281 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
Seeley Ex Rel. Seeley v. Sobczak 281 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
Blamey Ex Rel. Blamey v. Brown 270 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1978
Blamey Ex Rel. Blamey v. Brown 270 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1978
Two cases are relevant to this consideration — Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , and Fitzer v. Bloom, Minn.