Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jackson v. Reiling, 249 N.W.2d 896.

34 citing documents.

Raymond Kvalvog, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The CastleRock Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Tyler Halva, Minn. 2021
He also is not entitled to recovery of damages that are “remote and speculative.” Jackson v. Reiling
Christina Ginther, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[T]he doctrine of invited error [] precludes a party from asserting error on appeal which he invited or could have prevented in the court below.” (quotation omitted); see, (“Plaintiff cannot base his appeal on an instruction which his own counsel submitted to the trial court by stipulation.”).
Kyle Wendell Else, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
There is no general test of re mote and speculative damages, and such matters should usually be left to the judgment of the [district] court.” (citations omitted).
Tyler Halva, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
He 7 also is not entitled to recovery of damages that are “remote and speculative.”
Richard R. Fageroos, Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
or speculate that such circumstances may arise, Jackson v. Reiling , (precluding “remote” or “speculative” damages) .
Jason Rhoades, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Valley Paving, Inc. v. Stanley Consultants, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Valley Paving, Inc. v. Stanley Consultants, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563
Kaytee Hooser v. Keith Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kaytee Hooser v. Keith Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Damages that “are remote and speculative cannot be recovered.” Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Damages which are remote and 15 speculative cannot be recovered.” Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563, d 896, 897 (1977).
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Damages which are remote and speculative cannot be recovered.” Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563
Larson v. Lakeview Lofts, LLC 804 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Larson v. Lakeview Lofts, LLC 804 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Remote and speculative damages cannot be recovered, but there is no general test for identifying damages that are remote or speculative, and “such matters should usually be left to the judgment of the [district] court.” Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563 , see also Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (“Uncertainty as to the fact of whether any damages were sustained at all is fatal to recovery.” (quo *359 tation omitted)).
Friend v. Gopher Co., Inc. 771 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Friend v. Gopher Co., Inc. 771 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563 , cert.
Bryson v. Pillsbury Co. 573 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Bryson v. Pillsbury Co. 573 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The determination of whether damages are too speculative or remote “should usually be left to the judgment of the trial court.” Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563
Faimon v. Winona State University 540 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Faimon v. Winona State University 540 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562 , (holding that if causation and damages are difficult to determine,, injury is too speculative to support a claim).
Smits v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smits v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 525 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563 , , cert.
Whipple v. Independent School District No. 621 424 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Whipple v. Independent School District No. 621 424 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563 , cert.
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 183 (citing Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563 , 249 *).
Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1986
Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1986
Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562 , , cert.
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563