Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Briggs, 256 N.W.2d 305.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    See McInnis, d at 880, 892–94 (involving seven shots toward two victims); 397–98 (Minn. 1998) (involving seven shots toward six victims); State v. Marquardt , (involving two shots toward seven victims); (involving 20 shots toward three victims).
  • State v. Skipintheday 717 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Skipintheday 717 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 2006
    See, -47 (Minn.1979) (multiple murders merited multiple sentences); (an aggravated assault and a sex crime merited multiple sentences); -06 (Minn.1977) (three sentences merited for defendant who fired 20 bullets at three victims); -83 (Minn.1983) (where multiple deaths were a reasonably foreseeable consequence, a vehicular homicide killing two people merited two sentences).
  • State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Rhoades 690 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353, 360 , (quoting Stangvik); (same).
  • State v. Anderson 463 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Anderson 463 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    See, where we upheld three consecutive prison terms imposed on a defendant who was found guilty of three counts of aggravated assault for firing, twenty rounds of ammunition at three people on a porch.
  • State v. Montalvo 324 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Montalvo 324 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Scott 298 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Scott 298 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Morgan 296 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Marquardt 294 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Morgan 296 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Marquardt 294 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1980
    See, e. g., *851 where we upheld three consecutive prison terms imposed on a defendant who was found guilty of three counts of aggravated assault for firing twenty rounds of ammunition at three people on a porch.
  • State v. Adams 295 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Adams 295 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1980
    that while a defendant charged with four counts of attempted murder in the first degree was entitled to a lesser included offense instruction on aggravated assault, he was not entitled to an instruction on simple assault.
  • State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Olson 291 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 1980
    State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376 , State ex rel.
  • State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
    State v, Briggs, is an example.
  • Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
  • Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
    Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353 , see, State v. Prudhomme, 303 Minn. 376
  • State v. Armell 281 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Armell 281 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1979
    Admitting that the statute specifically exempts burglary and that he could be sentenced for two more offenses ’because there were two victims — see, — defendant agrees that he was properly sentenced for the burglary and the two aggravated robberies.
  • State v. DeFoe 280 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1979
  • State v. DeFoe 280 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1979
  • LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
  • LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979