DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Marsyla, 269 N.W.2d 2.

28 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    He was accused of criminal sexual conduct by forcing himself sexually on A.L.K., which is behavior colloquially and universally called, simply, “rape.” See, (“Defendant argues that proof that he ‘raped’ Gail was not clear and convincing D-2 because there was no testimony as to penetration, an essential element of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree.”); American Heritage Dictionary 1458 (5th ed. 2011) (defining “rape” primarily as “the crime
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
    3 See, (defendant requested mistrial after challenging in-court identification elicited from Spreigl witness); (defendant requested mistrial after state introduced evidence not covered in Spreigl notice).
  • State v. Washington 693 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2005
    3 See, e.g., Coralin v. State , , 16 (Minn. 1985) (defendant requested mistrial after challenging in-court identification elicited from Spreigl witness); State v. Marsyla , , 3 (Minn. 1978) (defendant requested mistrial after state introduced evidence not covered in Spreigl notice).
  • State v. Raymond 440 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Raymond 440 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1989
    -6 (Minn. 1978); (rev. denied Aug.
  • State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
    this court cited with approval 9 McCarr, Minnesota Practice, Criminal Law and Procedure, § 1521 (1976), which read in part: “All the time needed for premeditation or deliberation is that required to form the intent to kill.
  • State v. Alladin 408 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Alladin 408 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Hyatt 402 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Hyatt 402 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Although this task of inference is for the jury, the jury’s responsibility is qualified by the principle that to sustain a conviction “the sum of the inferences reasonably to be drawn from the circumstances [must be] consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational belief of innocence.” Id.
  • State v. Kanniainen 367 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Kanniainen 367 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Boyce, 284 Minn. 242, 260
  • State v. Fratzke 354 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Fratzke 354 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1984
    (defendant had a blood alcohol content of .20% at the time he killed three people.
  • State v. Jones 347 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Jones 347 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Housley 322 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
    d at 91 ; d at 901; d at 544
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
    State v. Lindsey, 507 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1974).
  • State v. Black 291 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Black 291 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1980
  • State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979
  • State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979