Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342.

46 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly 6 N.W.3d 161 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly 6 N.W.3d 161 Minn. 2024
n.17 (Minn. 1980) (requiring a preliminary probable cause hearing); (requiring an attorney for a criminal defendant charged with a misdemeanor); (requiring an attorney for indigent defendants in paternity adjudications “where the complainant is represented by the county attorney”); Scales, d at 592 (requiring electronic recording of all custodial interrogations).
In re the Marriage of: Esther Jayasheela Potti, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“There is no statutory or constitutional right to counsel in a dissolution proceeding.” (noting that, generally, indigent partie s do not have a right to court-appointed counsel in civil proceedings).
Chambers v. State 831 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 2013
Thole v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Thole v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(paternity actions); see also Cox, d at 402 (civil contempt).
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
In Re the Welfare of J.B. 782 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2010
In addition, we have held that an indigent parent charged with civil contempt for failure to pay child support is entitled to counsel at public expense, -04 (Minn.1984), as are indigent defendants in paternity cases
In Re Conservatorship of Malecha 607 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re Conservatorship of Malecha 607 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(civil-contempt proceedings for failure to pay child support); (paternity action).
State v. Lefthand 488 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1992
State v. Lefthand 488 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1992
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schmitz v. Stransky 454 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schmitz v. Stransky 454 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
1.” The statute does not contain the word ‘indigent.’ The correct language, as discussed above, is “unable to pay timely.” However, the case upon which Stransky relies, was decided before the present statute was enacted.
Nash v. Allen 392 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nash v. Allen 392 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
County of Hennepin Ex Rel. Bartlow v. Brinkman 378 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1985
County of Hennepin Ex Rel. Bartlow v. Brinkman 378 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1985
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1985
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 365 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 365 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
for example, the Minnesota Supreme Court established a right to counsel in paternity proceedings although a paternity action is civil.
County of Hennepin ex rel. Bartlow v. Brinkman 364 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
County of Hennepin ex rel. Bartlow v. Brinkman 364 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State Ex Rel. Ondracek v. Blohm 363 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State Ex Rel. Ondracek v. Blohm 363 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the court held that in paternity adjudications counsel must be provided indigent defendants where the complainant is represented by the county attorney.
Cox v. Slama 355 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1984
Cox v. Slama 355 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1984
In Hepfel v. Bashaw, this court established the right to counsel in paternity proceedings because “given the present adversary nature of paternity adjudications, there is no better method available to us to protect the important interests involved.”
State v. Boyd 331 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1983
State v. Boyd 331 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1983
and State, all dealing with the use of blood tests to establish paternity in paternity suits.
Matter of Peters 332 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1983
Matter of Peters 332 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1983
[5] However, that in an action of a civil nature to establish paternity the putative father was entitled to appointed counsel when the complainant is represented by the county attorney at public expense, respondent should be entitled to appointed counsel in this disciplinary matter because the director and attorneys h
Berrisford v. Berrisford 322 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1982
Berrisford v. Berrisford 322 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1982
State v. Caldwell 322 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
Hennepin County Welfare Board v. Ayers 304 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1981
Hennepin County Welfare Board v. Ayers 304 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1981
County of Ramsey v. S. M. F. 298 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1980
County of Freeborn v. Bryson 294 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 1980
State, on Behalf of Hastings v. Denny 296 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1980
State, on Behalf of Hastings v. Denny 296 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1980
-48 (Minn.1979); State ex rel.
County of Ramsey v. S. M. F. 298 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1980
In these cases in which the mother is “expected, if not compelled to cooperate * * * in order to remain eligible for assistance,” it is quite proper for the county to protect the mother from any unnecessary intrusion.
Ramsey County Public Defender's Office v. Fleming 294 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1980
Ramsey County Public Defender's Office v. Fleming 294 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1980
we held that counsel must be provided indigent defendants in paternity adjudications where the complainant is represented by the County Attorney and we referred to Rule 5.02 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure which has to do with the appointment of attorneys for indigent defendants in criminal cases.
Wessels v. Swanson 289 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1979
Wessels v. Swanson 289 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1979