Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wangen v. City of Fountain, 255 N.W.2d 813.

29 citing documents.

Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
dent contractor in the workers’ comp ensation context, for example, we consider the fo llowing non-exhaustive common-law factors: “(1) The right to control the means and manner of perfo rmance; (2) the mode of payment; (3) the furnishings of material or tools; (4) the control of the premises where the work is done; and (5) the right of the employer to discharge.” –15 (Minn. 1977).10 Of these, the most important is “the right to control the means and manner of performance.” Id.
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 814 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 814 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Boily v. Commissioner of Economic Security 544 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1996
Boily v. Commissioner of Economic Security 544 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1996
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlson 442 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlson 442 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Porter Farms, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Porter Farms, Inc. 382 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Paske v. County of Dakota 356 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Paske v. County of Dakota 356 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Murphy Trucking Co., 307 Minn. 271, 274
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline 348 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline 348 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Iverson v. Independent School District No. 547, Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines, 268 Minn. 141, 143
Kern v. Steele County 322 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1982
Kern v. Steele County 322 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1982
Accord, Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines, 268 Minn. 141, 143
Kahn v. State 289 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980
Kahn v. State 289 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980
See also Wangen *742 v. City of Fountain
Palmquist v. Meister 277 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 1979
Palmquist v. Meister 277 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 1979
Butler v. Blonigen Const. Inc., Minn., Wangen v. City of' Fountain, Minn., Lundy v. City of Worthington, supra.
Kuehn v. State, Department of Tenth Judicial District 271 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1978
Kuehn v. State, Department of Tenth Judicial District 271 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1978
See, Wangen v. City of Fountain, Minn.
Brinkman v. Page Trucking Co., Inc. 270 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1978
Brinkman v. Page Trucking Co., Inc. 270 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1978
Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines, 268 Minn. 141 , Tretter v. Dart Transit Co., 271 Minn. 131 , Wangen v. City of Fountain, Minn.
Johnson v. Par-Z Contracting, Inc. 266 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1978
Johnson v. Par-Z Contracting, Inc. 266 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1978
See, Wangen v. City of Fountain, Minn.
Holzemer v. Minnesota Milk Co. 259 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1977
Holzemer v. Minnesota Milk Co. 259 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1977
The factors applicable in determining the question have been stated often, most recently in Wangen v. City of Fountain, Minn.
Iverson v. Independent School District No. 547 257 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1977
Iverson v. Independent School District No. 547 257 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1977
Wangen v. City of Fountain, Minn.