Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Seifert, 256 N.W.2d 87.

28 citing documents.

Vaundell Duwayne Kingbird, Minn. 2022
(stating in dicta that the term “firearm,” as used in Minn. Stat. § 609.02, subd.
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang 887 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang 887 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
(per curiam), the court held that the definition of the term “firearm” is not “ ‘restricted in meaning to guns using gunpowder,’ ” but is to be broadly construed to also include guns using compressed air as a propellant.
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Clyde Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Jamal Poole Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Jamal Poole Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The Fleming court drew upon the Minnesota Supreme Court’s where the supreme court held that a BB gun was a “firearm” within the definition of “dangerous weapon” under Minn. Stat. § 609.02, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Clyde Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In doing so, we applied the definition of 9 “firearm”
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Darrell Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Darrell Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 540-41 (noting that a gas-cartridge BB gun satisfies the definition of “firearm” ).
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
For example, in State v. Seifert, the defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon under Minn. Stat. § 609.245 (1974) and was subject to a minimum sentence under Minn. Stat. § 609.11 (1974), which authorized imposition of a minimum sentence if a defendant “‘had in his possession a firearm or used a dangerous weapon at the time of the offense.’” -88 (Minn. 1977) (quoting Minn. Stat. § 609.11).
State of Minnesota v. Delbert Keith Sybrandt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Delbert Keith Sybrandt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Fleming 724 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Fleming 724 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Coauette 601 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Coauette 601 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
2 In State v. Seifert, the supreme court, as one of three bases for upholding an aggravated robbery conviction, held that a C02 BB pistol qualified as a “firearm.”
State v. Dendy 598 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Dendy 598 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(term “firearm” should be defined broadly to include guns using gunpowder or newer types of projective propellants).
State v. Newman 538 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Newman 538 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(court relied on game and fish laws’ definition when determining that BB gun used in aggravated robbery was dangerous weapon).
State v. Hysell 449 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Hysell 449 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by