Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shymanski v. Nash, 251 N.W.2d 854.

25 citing documents.

Lee Ray Bolch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
When a trier of fact relies on the opinion of one expert over that of another, “the decision of the [trier of fact] is not open to review on appeal,” as long as that “opinion has a reasonable basis in fact .”
GGG, Incorporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When a factfinder relies on the opinion of one expert over that of another, “the decision of the [factfinder] is not open to review on appeal,” as long as that “opinion has a reasonable basis in fact .”
Mark Kedrowski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., –25 (Minn. 2000); Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308, LeMieux v. Bishop, 296 Minn. 372, 384, see also In re Zurn Pex Plumbing Prods .
Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. State Investment Board 677 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. State Investment Board 677 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308
Gale v. County of Hennepin 609 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2000
Gale v. County of Hennepin 609 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2000
See Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 307
Nugent v. Kerr 543 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Nugent v. Kerr 543 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308 , (jury’s acceptance of one expert’s opinion over another will be sustained as long as that opinion has reasonable factual basis).
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308
McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1987
McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1987
Cf. Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308
Krein v. Raudabough 406 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Krein v. Raudabough 406 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Judging the weight and credibility of conflicting expert testimony is a matter for the jury, Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308 , Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.
Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308
Hunt v. Estate of Hanson 356 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hunt v. Estate of Hanson 356 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304, 308
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
See, Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304 , Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
See, also, Boland v. Garber, Minn., Shymanski v. Nash, Minn.
Boland v. Garber 257 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1977
Boland v. Garber 257 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1977
Shymanski v. Nash, Minn., Dorn v. Home Farmers Mutual Ins.