Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Martin, 261 N.W.2d 341.

39 citing documents.

State v. Galvan 912 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 2018
State v. Galvan 912 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 2018
See Lodermeier , d at 398 (relying in part on the nature of the wounds to support a finding of premeditation); State v. Martin , , 345 (Minn. 1977) (noting that the brutality of a killing might not alone "be sufficient evidence of premeditation" but it could "be considered by the jury as supporting an inference that defendant premeditated to act"); State v. Hare , 278 Minn. 405 , , 822 (1967) (holding that aiming a firearm at a v
State v. Moore 846 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2014
State v. Moore 846 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2014
(concluding that a brutal killing, including the infliction of post-mortem wounds, supports a premeditated murder verdict).
State v. Fairbanks 842 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2014
State v. Fairbanks 842 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2014
And if photographs are helpful as an aid to verbal testimony, they are not rendered inadmissible merely because they vividly show the shocking details of a crime, Hummel, d at 74 .
State v. Hurd 819 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 2012
State v. Hurd 819 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 2012
e prospective victim to a place where others are unlikely to intrude.’ ” Moore, d at 361 (quoting Wayne R. LaFave & Austin W. Scott Jr., Handbook on Criminal Law § 73, at 564-65 (1972)); (finding premeditation when the defendant followed the victim to a place where he knew she would be alone before shooting her); (finding evidence of premeditation when, the defendant drove the victim to a secluded area before killing her).
State v. Goodloe 718 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 2006
State v. Goodloe 718 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 2006
State v. Stewart 643 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 2002
State v. Stewart 643 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 2002
State v. Walen 563 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1997
State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
Though in Swain , multiple blows to the victim’s head by the defendant did not lead to a finding of premeditation, this court cited two cases, State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , in which multiple blows did support such a finding.
State v. Brown 455 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Brown 455 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Triplett 435 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1989
State v. Triplett 435 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1989
(while the brutality of the killing does not alone support a finding of premeditation, it can certainly be considered by the jury as supporting an ’inference that defendant premeditated to act as he did).
State v. Ness 431 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1988
State v. Ness 431 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 1988
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
1420 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969); *767 (Minn.1977).
State v. Hanley 363 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1985
State v. Hanley 363 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1985
1420 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969)
State v. Threinen 328 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1983
State v. Threinen 328 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1983
State v. Lemire 315 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1982
State v. Lemire 315 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1982
Martin v. State 295 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1980
Martin v. State 295 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1980
The facts established at trial are recited in our opinion affirming the judgment of conviction, and we incorporate that statement in deciding this appeal.
State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979
State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979
We do not interpret Walker to mean that the duration of a beating alone will support the finding of premeditation, see, rather such a determination must be justified by an examination of the totality of the circumstances.
Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
State v. Yaeger 277 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1979
State v. Yaeger 277 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1979
Cases on this include: State v. Schotl, 289 Minn. 175 , State v. Kinderman, 271 Minn. 405 , certiorari denied, 384 U.S. 909 , 86 S.Ct.
State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
reiterated the prior rule that a “plan” to commit first degree murder need not be formulated in any specific length of time and that premeditation may be inferred in part from the number of times a weapon is used.