Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Leininger v. Anderson, 255 N.W.2d 22.
-
Mark Lukens, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(noting that the appellant has a “heavy” burden to show that the district court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous or that its legal conclusions are unsupported).
- Scott Trebelhorn, d/b/a Trebelhorn & Associates, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- In re the Marriage of: Kenneth M. Kuller v. Elizabeth L. Kuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Marriage of: Kenneth M. Kuller v. Elizabeth L. Kuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- River City Mortgage Corp. v. Baldus 695 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- River City Mortgage Corp. v. Baldus 695 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens 463 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens
463 N.W.2d 303
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
for rev. denied (Minn. April 29, *306 1987) (-27 (Minn.1977)).
- Knut. Co. v. Knutson Construction Co. 433 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Knut. Co. v. Knutson Construction Co. 433 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Nunnelee v. Schuna
431 N.W.2d 144
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
for rev. denied (Minn. April 29, 1987) (-27 (Minn.1977)).
- Marriage of Blattner v. Blattner 411 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Blattner v. Blattner 411 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lake Mille Lacs Investment, Inc. v. Payne 401 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lake Mille Lacs Investment, Inc. v. Payne 401 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp. 399 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp. 399 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Bloomington Electric Co. v. Freeman's, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Bloomington Electric Co. v. Freeman's, Inc. 394 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Larson v. County of St. Louis 366 N.W.2d 304 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Larson v. County of St. Louis 366 N.W.2d 304 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Medinvest Co. v. Methodist Hospital 359 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Medinvest Co. v. Methodist Hospital 359 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283 358 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283 358 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State Bank of Brooten v. American National Bank of Little Falls 266 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1978
-
State Bank of Brooten v. American National Bank of Little Falls
266 N.W.2d 496
Minn. 1978
In the recent case of Leininger v. Anderson, Minn., we stated that the application of cashier’s checks to satisfy certain obligations constituted “value” within the meaning of § 336.3-303(b).