Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hwy. 7 Embers, Inc. v. Northwestern National Bank, 256 N.W.2d 271.
- Jerry M. Gelao, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Richard L. Greenstreet v. Central Minnesota Educational Research & Development Council, Lowell ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Richard L. Greenstreet v. Central Minnesota Educational Research & Development Council, Lowell ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Wayne Willenberg v. Charles Frye, Karla Harrison, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Wayne Willenberg v. Charles Frye, Karla Harrison, ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
defines the scope and extent of the interest in land,” i.e., its “specific width, length, and location.” d at 704 (citing 7 David A. Thomas, Thompson on Real Property § 60.04(c)(1)(i) (2d ed. 2006), and Highway 7 Embers, Inc. v. Northwestern Nat’l Bank, ).
- Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nat’l Bank, -78 (Minn. 1977) (quotations omitted).
- Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins 863 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins
863 N.W.2d 437
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nat’l Bank, see Larson, d at 704 (“The written instrument creating the easement .
- Larson v. State 790 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2010
-
Larson v. State
790 N.W.2d 700
Minn. 2010
Nat’l Bank, (“When an easement is by express grant, its extent depends entirely upon the construction of the terms of the grant.”).
- Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 575 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1998
- Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 575 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1998
- Bergh & Misson Farms, Inc. v. Great Lakes Transmission Co. 565 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 1997
-
Bergh & Misson Farms, Inc. v. Great Lakes Transmission Co.
565 N.W.2d 23
Minn. 1997
Highway 7 Embers, Inc. v. Northwestern Nat’l Bank, -77 (Minn.1977).
- Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lien v. Loraus 403 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Lien v. Loraus
403 N.W.2d 286
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
7 Embers, (citations omitted).
- Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc.
392 N.W.2d 724
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nevertheless, such a description must contain more than a notation that an adjacent building is “to be located so as not to obstruct view.” Cf. Highway 7 Embers
- Braaten v. Jarvi 347 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Braaten v. Jarvi
347 N.W.2d 279
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
535 (1920); Highway 7 Embers, Burns v. Pla-checki, 301 Minn. 445
- State Ex Rel. Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc. v. State 329 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1983
- State Ex Rel. Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc. v. State 329 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1983