Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hwy. 7 Embers, Inc. v. Northwestern National Bank, 256 N.W.2d 271.

25 citing documents.

Jerry M. Gelao, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard L. Greenstreet v. Central Minnesota Educational Research & Development Council, Lowell ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard L. Greenstreet v. Central Minnesota Educational Research & Development Council, Lowell ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Wayne Willenberg v. Charles Frye, Karla Harrison, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Wayne Willenberg v. Charles Frye, Karla Harrison, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
defines the scope and extent of the interest in land,” i.e., its “specific width, length, and location.” d at 704 (citing 7 David A. Thomas, Thompson on Real Property § 60.04(c)(1)(i) (2d ed. 2006), and Highway 7 Embers, Inc. v. Northwestern Nat’l Bank, ).
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nat’l Bank, -78 (Minn. 1977) (quotations omitted).
Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins 863 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins 863 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nat’l Bank, see Larson, d at 704 (“The written instrument creating the easement .
Larson v. State 790 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2010
Larson v. State 790 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2010
Nat’l Bank, (“When an easement is by express grant, its extent depends entirely upon the construction of the terms of the grant.”).
Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 575 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1998
Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 575 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1998
Bergh & Misson Farms, Inc. v. Great Lakes Transmission Co. 565 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 1997
Bergh & Misson Farms, Inc. v. Great Lakes Transmission Co. 565 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 1997
Highway 7 Embers, Inc. v. Northwestern Nat’l Bank, -77 (Minn.1977).
Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lien v. Loraus 403 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lien v. Loraus 403 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
7 Embers, (citations omitted).
Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nevertheless, such a description must contain more than a notation that an adjacent building is “to be located so as not to obstruct view.” Cf. Highway 7 Embers
Braaten v. Jarvi 347 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Braaten v. Jarvi 347 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
535 (1920); Highway 7 Embers, Burns v. Pla-checki, 301 Minn. 445
State Ex Rel. Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc. v. State 329 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1983
State Ex Rel. Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc. v. State 329 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1983