Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., 258 N.W.2d 570.

98 citing documents.

Benjamin Menier, a minor, by and through Robin Menier as parent and natural guardian, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
he reasonable-expectations doctrine to its enforcement of the UIM endorsement’s reducing clause on summary judgment for three reasons: (1) the reducing clause is ambiguous and was hidden in the policy; (2) Cincinnati’s marketing materials were misleading because they did not accurately describe the product; and (3) the rule established in Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., which is the 6 basis for Minnesota’s reasonable-expectations doctrine, is not limited to renewals of an i
Nationwide Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., ).
Charlotte Copiskey, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
First, she argues that the drop-down provision in the 2017-18 policy’s endorsement is void because Wadena did not provide written notice of the endorsement as required by Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.
Jessie Stoltenberg, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., Ltd. v. Fire Watch, Inc. , controls this case.
Lang Fur Farms, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Pleasure Creek Townhomes Homeowners’ Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters 831 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 2013
Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., ).
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 825 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2013
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 825 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2013
Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., ).
Schupp v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 821 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Schupp v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 821 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 813 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2012
Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 813 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2012
Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., ).
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC 812 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLC 812 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc. 762 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2009
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 734 N.W.2d 695 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Wakefield Pork, Inc. v. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. 731 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., ).
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co. 718 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 2006
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co. 718 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 2006
Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., -75 (Minn.1977).
Soo Line Railroad v. Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming 694 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Soo Line Railroad v. Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming 694 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mutual 679 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vaubel Farms, Inc. v. Shelby Farmers Mutual 679 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co., v. Fire Watch, Inc.
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Tower Insurance Co. v. Minnesota Holstein-Freisan Breeders' Ass'n 605 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Tower Insurance Co. v. Minnesota Holstein-Freisan Breeders' Ass'n 605 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 566 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1997
Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 566 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1997
Co., Ltd. v. Fire Watch, Inc.
Bast v. Capitol Indemnity Corp. 562 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Bast v. Capitol Indemnity Corp. 562 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Warrick v. Graffiti, Inc. 550 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Warrick v. Graffiti, Inc. 550 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., the changes were effective and thus precluded Mrs. Warrick from recovering pecuniary loss damages from Park Glen because the policy limit for loss of means of support had already been exhausted.
Vierkant Ex Rel. Johnson v. AMCO Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Vierkant Ex Rel. Johnson v. AMCO Insurance Co. 543 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., -75 (Minn.1977); Samuelson v. Farm Bureau Mut.
Brault v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Co. 538 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Brault v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Co. 538 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Gates 530 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Gates 530 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Eiynk v. Sabrowsky 524 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Eiynk v. Sabrowsky 524 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Haarstad v. Graff 517 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1994
Haarstad v. Graff 517 N.W.2d 582 Minn. 1994
Benton v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. 500 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1993

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by