Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Erickson v. General United Life Insurance Co., 256 N.W.2d 255.
- In Re the Estate of Tourville 366 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
In Re the Estate of Tourville
366 N.W.2d 380
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
56.05; -59 (Minn.1977) (summary judgment is proper when the nonmoving party fails to provide the court with specific facts indicating that there is a genuine issue of fact).
- Alexander Construction Co. v. C & H Contracting, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Alexander Construction Co. v. C & H Contracting, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Blackburn v. Doubleday Broadcasting Co. 353 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1984
-
Blackburn v. Doubleday Broadcasting Co.
353 N.W.2d 550
Minn. 1984
Plaintiffs cannot create a genuine issue of fact merely by pleading that the phenomenon in question is “distortion.”
- Wilson v. Ramacher 352 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
-
Wilson v. Ramacher
352 N.W.2d 389
Minn. 1984
(summary judgment is proper when nonmoving party fails to provide the court with specific facts indicating that there is a genuine issue of fact).
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Gypsum George's Cash & Carry Building Materials, Inc. 346 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Gypsum George's Cash & Carry Building Materials, Inc. 346 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Dalco Corp. v. Dixon 338 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1983
-
Dalco Corp. v. Dixon
338 N.W.2d 437
Minn. 1983
We have previously held that in order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment a party may not rely on general statements of fact but rather “must demonstrate at the time the motion is made that specific facts are in existence which create a genuine issue for trial.”
- Urbaniak Implement Co. v. Monsrud 336 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1983
-
Urbaniak Implement Co. v. Monsrud
336 N.W.2d 286
Minn. 1983
It is not enough in an affidavit to allege in argumentative and conclusory fashion that a debt is usurious; the affidavit which seeks to oppose successfully a motion for summary judgment must set out that “specific facts are in existence which create a genuine issue for trial.”
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. City of Lakeville 313 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1981
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. City of Lakeville 313 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1981