Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Johnston, 254 N.W.2d 360.

72 citing documents.

Anshuman Bhatia, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In cases of alleged misrepresentation in a real-estate transaction, “the measure of damages is the amount paid less the fair market value of the property.”
Gaertner Ex Rel. Minnesota State Patrol v. One 1999 Dodge Pickup Truck, MN Lic. No. GKR-391 668 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Gaertner Ex Rel. Minnesota State Patrol v. One 1999 Dodge Pickup Truck, MN Lic. No. GKR-391 668 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ziols v. Rice County Board of Commissioners 661 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ziols v. Rice County Board of Commissioners 661 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See, (stating reviewing court will not reverse for district court’s failure to explain its findings).
Application of Jobe 477 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re Estate of Aspenson 470 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re Estate of Aspenson 470 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 469 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 469 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Where the issues have been decided by the trial court, “the reviewing court is not required to reverse simply because the trial court might have gone into more detail in the explanation of its findings.”
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
Criticized In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
See, Cohen v. Steinke, 223 Minn. 292
Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co. 436 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1989
Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co. 436 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1989
Davis v. Johnson 415 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Davis v. Johnson 415 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. Mitchell 413 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. Mitchell 413 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing Caroga Realty Co. v. Tapper, 274 Minn. 164 , (review *850 ing court not required to reverse merely because findings could have been more detailed)).
Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bank North v. Soule 409 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bank North v. Soule 409 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Beck v. Plastic Products Co., Inc. 412 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Beck v. Plastic Products Co., Inc. 412 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Demning v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 411 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Demning v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 411 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ted Murr, Inc. v. Oberg 408 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ted Murr, Inc. v. Oberg 408 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Georgens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 406 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Georgens v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 406 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Goose v. Goose 406 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Goose v. Goose 406 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Montanari 404 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Montanari 404 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lieberman Music Co. v. Hagen 404 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lieberman Music Co. v. Hagen 404 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lien v. Loraus 403 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lien v. Loraus 403 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wenndt v. Wenndt 398 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The evidence presented turns on appellant’s credibility, and “due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.”
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nave v. Dovolos 395 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tysk v. Griggs, 253 Minn. 86
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wellens v. Thuening 393 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hay v. Dahle 386 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hay v. Dahle 386 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Farmers Security State Bank of Zumbrota v. Voegele 386 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Farmers Security State Bank of Zumbrota v. Voegele 386 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
This conclusion is based on the trial court’s finding that “Joseph and Susanne E. Voegele did not give plaintiff bank a UCC security agreement on December 27, 1979, in and for ‘farm personal property.’ ” This finding is not clearly erroneous
Selland Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. King 384 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Selland Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. King 384 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1986