Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Oevering, 268 N.W.2d 68.

79 citing documents.

  • State v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Bouwman 354 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Bouwman 354 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Parker 353 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Parker 353 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Olson 342 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Olson 342 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    to indicate just how few facts are required to constitute probable cause.
  • State v. Speak 339 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Speak 339 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1983
    Then, this court upheld the warrant-less nonconsensual removal of blood from an unconscious person who was not placed under arrest.
  • State v. Lemire 315 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Lemire 315 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1982
    However, this court stated: When reviewing a jury verdict, we must examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and assume that the jury disbelieved any testimony which conflicts with the result it reached.
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
    this court stated: When reviewing a jury verdict, we must examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and assume that the jury disbelieved any testimony which conflicts with the result it reached.
  • State v. Aguirre 295 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Aguirre 295 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1980
    we upheld, against a constitutional attack, the warrantless nonconsensual removal of blood from an unconscious person (or one not capable of giving consent) who was not placed under arrest.
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Hauge 286 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1979
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Wiehle 287 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1979
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Hauge 286 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1979
    The Wiehle case, which holds that the statutorily implied consent of an unconscious driver continues notwithstanding his obvious incapacity to respond to the implied consent advisory, controls decision in this case.
  • State, Department of Public Safety v. Wiehle 287 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
    State v. Thompson, 273 Minn. 1 , , certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 817 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Fossen 282 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Fossen 282 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1979
    As to the sufficiency of the evidence, this court stated: “ * * * When reviewing a jury verdict, we must examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and assume that the jury disbelieved any testimony which conflicts with the result it reached.
  • State v. Gallahue 273 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Gallahue 273 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1978
    (Filed December 8, 1978); State v. Capelle, 285 Minn. 205
  • State v. Dewey 272 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Dewey 272 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1978