DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Markwardt v. State, Water Resources Board, 254 N.W.2d 371.

166 citing documents.

A19-0118 A19-0124 A20-1271 A20-1380 A20-1385 Minn. 2023
Bd., and we therefore hold that the permit decision was arbitrary and capricious.
In the Matter of the Public Waters Restoration Order Issued to Timothy Maciej. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Diane Saunders, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Determination of the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Lower Pool … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 371, 374 (Minn. 1977).
In the Matter of the Appeal by Kind Heart Daycare, Inc. of the Order of License Revocation and … Minn. 2017
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 897 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 897 N.W.2d 792 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
In re Application of Gourley Brothers, LLC for a Water Appropriation Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Application of Gourley Brothers, LLC for a Water Appropriation Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In re Application of Gourley Brothers, LLC for a Water Appropriation Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Application of Gourley Brothers, LLC for a Water Appropriation Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000 769 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000 769 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Bd., (interpreting a previous version of Minn.Stat.
In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 768 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2009
In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 768 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2009
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Meuleners 725 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Meuleners 725 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Shagalow v. State, Department of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Bd., Johnson, d at 457 .
In Re the Appeal of the Exclusion of Molnar 720 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Appeal of the Exclusion of Molnar 720 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re an Investigation Into the Commission's Jurisdiction Over the Hutchinson's Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline 707 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re an Investigation Into the Commission's Jurisdiction Over the Hutchinson's Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline 707 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Markwardt v. State, Water Resources Bd.
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural Resources 704 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
An agency’s decision is arbitrary and capricious if it is an exercise of the agency’s will, rather than its judgment, Markwardt v. State, Water Resources Bd., or if the decision is based on a whim, or is devoid of articulated reason.
McEa v. Mpca 660 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 660 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Followed Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 660 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bd., (interpreting Minn.Stat.
Followed McEa v. Mpca 660 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bd., (interpreting Minn.Stat.
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
§ 14.69(a), (b), (e), (f) (2002); Markwardt v. State, Water Resources Bd.
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits 642 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits 642 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bd., (citation omitted).
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc. 642 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc. 642 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bd., ), review denied (Minn. June 23, 1995).
In Re the Expulsion of E.J.W. From Independent School District No. 500 632 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Expulsion of E.J.W. From Independent School District No. 500 632 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 606 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 606 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000