Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital, 257 N.W.2d 366.

35 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Appeal by Amy Seelye of the Maltreatment Determination and the Amended Order of … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp.
In the Matter of the Administrative Citation: RFS 16-1206097, October 18, 2016, 3518 Logan Avenue North, Issued to: … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(directing aggrieved party to commence a declaratory judgment action in district court); see also Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp., (recognizing that administrative agencies lack subject- matter jurisdiction to address constitutional issues).
Robert Zeman, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp ., (stating that constitutional challenges cannot be decided by administrative bodies).
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp.
Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 859 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 859 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cf. Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp., -69 (Minn.1977) (administrative agencies lack subject-matter jurisdiction to decide constitutional issues because those issues are within exclusive province of the judicial branch).
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees 820 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees 820 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp., (stating that administrative agencies lack subject-matter jurisdiction to decide constitutional issues, which are within exclusive province of judicial branch).
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes 800 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes 800 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp., -69 (Minn. 1977).
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Neeland v. Clearwater Mem’l Hosp.
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 672 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 672 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hosp., -69 (Minn.1977) (stating that an administrative agency lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide constitutional issues because those questions are within the exclusive province of the judicial branch).
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance Service 500 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance Service 500 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
the supreme court addressed a constitutional claim that was not previously raised.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin 451 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1990
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin 451 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1990
Cases finding no standing include: Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk, 301 Minn. 137 , appeal dismissed, 420 U.S. 916 , 95 S.Ct.
Holt v. State, Board of Medical Examiners 431 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Holt v. State, Board of Medical Examiners 431 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kons v. Gaylord Community Hospital 428 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kons v. Gaylord Community Hospital 428 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the supreme court held the employer lacked standing to attack the constitutionality of the double affirmation clause, in part because the hospital was required to fully reimburse the compensation fund for all benefits paid.
Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking 412 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Seemann v. Little Crow Trucking 412 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Although Little Crow claims that the due process issue is not reviewable at this time because it was not previously raised, stated that constitutional issues may not be presented to or passed upon by administrative bodies below; the appellate court is the first forum possessing subject matter jurisdiction.
Tax Rate for the Calendar Year 1985 Assigned to the Account of Benjamin's, Edina, Inc. v. Department of … 396 N.W.2d 261 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tax Rate for the Calendar Year 1985 Assigned to the Account of Benjamin's, Edina, Inc. v. Department of … 396 N.W.2d 261 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Padilla v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Examiners 382 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Padilla v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Examiners 382 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council No. 65 v. State, Public Employment Relations Board 372 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council No. 65 v. State, Public Employment Relations Board 372 N.W.2d 786 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Generally public officials “charged with the performance of a ministerial duty will not be allowed to question the constitutionality of such a law.” (quoting State ex rel.
Easy Street West v. Commissioner of Economic Security 345 N.W.2d 250 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Easy Street West v. Commissioner of Economic Security 345 N.W.2d 250 Minn. Ct. App. 1984