Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co., 257 N.W.2d 551.

39 citing documents.

Eric John Blehr, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (citation omitted).
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 913 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 2018
James Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Company 874 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Company 874 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., (noting that “the interest factor arose only because [defendant] contested its obligation and refused to pay the principal balance owed as of the date of default”); David A. Brooks Enters., Inc. v. First Sys.
Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
River Valley Truck Center, Inc. v. Interstate Companies 704 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., Marshall v. Marvin H. Anderson Constr.
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co., ) (Minn.1977) (equating liquidated claims and readily ascertainable unliq-uidated claims).
O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp. 543 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp. 543 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (2) the terms used are susceptible to more than one meaning.
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metcalf 501 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metcalf 501 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Coppa 494 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Coppa 494 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marschall Ex Rel. Marschall v. Reinsurance Ass'n 447 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marschall Ex Rel. Marschall v. Reinsurance Ass'n 447 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
general contract law, the terms of a final and integrated written expression may not be contradicted by par-ol evidence of previous “understandings and negotiations * * * for the purpose of varying or contradicting the writing.” 3 A. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts § 573 (1960); see Lehman v. Stout, 261 Minn. 384, 389-91 , -45 (1961)
Marriage of Kiffer v. Kiffer 410 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kiffer v. Kiffer 410 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Amatuzio v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 409 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Amatuzio v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 409 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
v. Midwestern Machinery Co.
Steffl v. Roediger 406 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Steffl v. Roediger 406 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Solid Gold Realty, Inc. v. Mondry 399 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Solid Gold Realty, Inc. v. Mondry 399 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the supreme court stated: In determining whether interest should be allowed the question was not whether the parties agreed on the amount of damages but whether [the defendant] could have determined the amount of its potential liability from a generally recognized objective standard of measurement.
Blank v. Independent School District No. 16 393 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1986
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1986
Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. 387 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1986
See Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 206 (1982)
Klennert v. Dorholt 386 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Klennert v. Dorholt 386 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pearson-Berke, Inc. v. McIntosh 350 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1984
Pearson-Berke, Inc. v. McIntosh 350 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1984
Here the claim, though disputed, was liquidated in the sense that the debtor “could have determined the amount of [his] potential liability from a generally recognized objective standard of measurement.”
Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 275 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1979
Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 275 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1979