Cited by

61 citing documents.

Marriage of Rosenberg v. Rosenberg 379 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rosenberg v. Rosenberg 379 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 375 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 375 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
SST, INC. v. City of Minneapolis 288 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1979
SST, INC. v. City of Minneapolis 288 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1979
As we pointed out in Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun Club, MERA does not prescribe elaborate standards to guide trial courts but allows a case-by-case determination by use of a balancing test, analogous to the one traditionally employed by courts of equity, where the utility of a defendant’s conduct which interferes with natural resources is weighed against
State Ex Rel. Skeie v. Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. 281 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1979
LaValle v. Kulkay 277 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1979
LaValle v. Kulkay 277 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1979
Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun Club
People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 266 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 266 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
County of Freeborn v. Bryson, 309 Minn. 178 , Corwine v. Crow Wing County, 309 Minn. 345 , MPIRG v. White Bear Rod & Gun Club, Minn.