DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Krech, 252 N.W.2d 269.

34 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    In support of this argument, he compares his case to State v. Krech , .
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    The purpose of the statute is “ to protect against exaggerat ing the criminality of a person’ s conduct and to make both punishment and prosecution commensurate with culpability.” d 269, 272 (Minn. 1977).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    1, does n ot apply to petty misdemeanors because petty misdemeanors do not constitute “offe nses.” State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 464 n.2, n.2 (1977); see also Minn. Stat. § 152.027, subd.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    1, does not apply to petty misdemeanors, such as Johnson’s paraphernalia-possession conviction, because petty misdemeanors are not “offenses.” State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 464 n.2, d 269, 272 n.2 (1977); see also Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (defining possessing drug paraphernalia as a petty misdemeanor).
  • Distinguished State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    7 Voss cites State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, to support his contention that the incidents arose out of the same behavioral incident.
  • State v. Butcher 563 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Butcher 563 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 465 , -73 (1977).
  • State v. Jeter 558 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Jeter 558 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 466
  • State v. Gibson 475 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Gibson 475 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    See State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 465
  • State v. Anderson 468 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Anderson 468 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    See State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 465-66 , -73 (1977).
  • State v. Axford 419 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Axford 419 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 465
  • State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
    See State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461, 465
  • State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Howard 360 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See also State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461
  • STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson 358 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • STATE, CITY OF WOOD LAKE v. Johnson 358 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461 , 464 n. 2, , 272 n. 2 (1977) (citing State v. White, 300 Minn. 99 , ).
  • State v. Zimmerman 352 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Zimmerman 352 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461
  • State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
    See State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461
  • City of Moorhead v. Miller 295 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1980
  • City of Moorhead v. Miller 295 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1980
    and State v. Reiland, 274 Minn. 121
  • State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Alexander 290 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1980
    This statutory section prohibits multiple prosecutions and multiple punishments for offenses arising out of a “single behavioral incident.” State v. Krech, 312 Minn. 461
  • State v. Bailey 262 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Bailey 262 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 1977
    Petitioner’s citation of State v. Krech, Minn., is not on point.
  • State v. Sailor 257 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Sailor 257 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1977
    The first of these issues is answered affirmatively by our decision in State v. Krech, Minn.