Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Granger, 261 N.W.2d 335.

21 citing documents.

Mike Allen Homes, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“A court sitting as a court of equity, in its discretion, may determine which party is the prevailing party.”).
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to impose a surcharge on the trustee); see also In re Tr.
In re the Joan C. Ranallo Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Otto Bremer Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
And “a determination of what constitutes sufficient grounds for the removal of a trustee is within 13 the discretion of the [district] court.” In re Gershcow’s Will
Katie Howard, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Louis, -55 (Minn. 1998) ().
In re The Robert Preus and Donna Mae Preus Lake Property Family Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of the Revocable Trust Agreement of Avis V. Cordes under agreement dated February 12, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See In re Will of Gershcow , .
Lund v. Lund 924 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Will of Gershcow , , 338 (Minn. 1977).
In re: Trust of Phyllis Gene Jones, Settlor Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re: The Frank John Rodriguez Sr. Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minn. Stat. § 501B.16(9)(i)-(iii) (2014).4 “[T]he determination of what constitutes sufficient grounds for removal of a trustee is within the discretion of the [district] court.”
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Trust Agreement of D. Robert Sykes. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 495, 507 (Minn. 2012); -40 (Minn. 1977).
Posey v. Fossen 707 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In re Gershcow’s Will, Kusniryk v. Arrowhead Reg’l Corrections Bd.
Benigni v. County of St. Louis 585 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1998
Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 561 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Bachovchin v. Stingley 504 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The district court has discretion to determine who is a “prevailing party.” In re Gershcow’s Will, see, (sustaining trial court’s determination that plaintiff who was found equally negligent as defendant but was awarded damages by jury was prevailing party under 549.04).
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See In re Gershcow’s Will, (determining grounds for trustee removal is within trial court’s discretion).
Matter of Wrongful Death of Carlson 427 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to remove trustee for inconsequential deviations from legal requirements when rights of all beneficiaries were adequately protected and no prejudice to trust corpus was shown).
Kusniryk v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections Board 413 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Gershcow’s Will
In Re Guardianship of Glenn 363 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In the supreme court affirmed the denial of a petition challenging the trustee’s management.
Reichert v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Co. 360 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
This statute requires only that there be a “prevailing party.” The trial court has discretion in determining who is a “prevailing party.” Matter of Gershcow’s Will