Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Streitz, 258 N.W.2d 768.

28 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
at 747-48; see also Milton, d at 801 (upholding the seizure of shell casings when the officer “had been sent to [the scene] because the police believed [the defendant] was a witness to a shooting homicide, which necessarily involved a gun and therefore most likely involved shell casings”); (“Although at the time the officers converged at [the location] they had no suspicions that they would find stolen property on the premises other than the speakers [for which they had a warrant], what they fou
State v. DeWald 463 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1990
State v. DeWald 463 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1990
State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 465 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Collard 414 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Collard 414 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(officer must also be justified in the intrusion that produced the view and the discovery must be inadvertent).
State v. Porter 411 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Porter 411 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
State v. Buschkopf 373 N.W.2d 756 Minn. 1985
2022, 2037-38 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
State v. Carr 361 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1985
State v. Carr 361 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1985
State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
State v. Kochendorfer 304 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1981
State v. Kochendorfer 304 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1981
2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.11 (1978); State v. Michaelson, 298 Minn. 524
State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
State v. Rieck 286 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1979
Professor LaFave, in discussing applicable principles in his treatise, 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.11 (1978), relies in part on three cases of this court, State v. Michaelson, 298 Minn. 524 , and State v. Cernohous, 295 Minn. 491
O'CONNOR v. Johnson 287 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1979
O'CONNOR v. Johnson 287 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1979
we stated: “The Fourth Amendment requirement that a search warrant ‘particularly’ describe the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized is designed to prevent general, exploratory searches.
State v. Yaeger 277 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1979
State v. Yaeger 277 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1979
State v. Smith 261 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1977
State v. Smith 261 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1977
See, State v. Streitz, Minn., , filed September 23, 1977.
State v. Ruud 259 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
State v. Ruud 259 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
See, State v. Streitz, Minn., Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 , 96 S.Ct.