Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp., 264 N.W.2d 374.

32 citing documents.

Edward Gerrety, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Kedrowski, d at 60 (holding that attacking alleged factual deficiency in an expert’s opinion is “properly the subject of a detailed cross- examination and argument to the jury, rather than a foundational- reliability determination under [r]ule 702”); 13 (stating that “any deficiencies” in the factual basis underlying an expert’s testimony “could have been brought out .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(citing Wenner v. Gulf Oi l Corp., -83 (Minn. 1978) (stating that “any deficiencies” in an expert’s testimony “could have been brought out by defendant on cross-examination”).
Mark Kedrowski, Minn. 2019
(stating that “any deficiencies” in an expert’s testimony “could have been brought out by defendant on cross- examination”).
Michelle J. Duppong, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp. , (admitting factual statement made in letter outlining plaintiff’s claim).
Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health … 889 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2017
Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health … 889 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2017
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cf. Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp., 6 -84 (Minn. 1978) (concluding that a contract’s contradictory clauses which first provided a warranty and then disclaimed any warranties “cannot be reasonably reconciled with one another”).
Kobluk v. University of Minnesota 574 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1998
Kobluk v. University of Minnesota 574 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1998
1280, 1284 (E.D.Mich.1988) (denying motion to compel production of preliminary drafts but granting motion as to identities of the drafters); 380 (Minn.1978) (finding that the trial court erred when it excluded as privileged a letter from the plaintiffs attorney to the defendant, since the “[p]laintiff clearly expected the[ ] facts [contained in the letter] to be communicated to defendant”).
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 474 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 474 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1991
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Schneider 402 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1987
State v. Schneider 402 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1987
Kwapien v. Starr 400 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kwapien v. Starr 400 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gunderson v. Olson 399 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gunderson v. Olson 399 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Prior Lake v. Ballard 375 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
City of Prior Lake v. Ballard 375 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing Briggs v. Chicago G.W.
City of New Prague, County of Scoot v. Hendricks 286 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1979
City of New Prague, County of Scoot v. Hendricks 286 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1979
Gardner v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, 267 Minn. 505
Chatfield v. Sherwin-Williams Co. 266 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1978
Chatfield v. Sherwin-Williams Co. 266 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1978
Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp., Minn., , filed February 17, 1978.