Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Otterness v. Horsley, 263 N.W.2d 403.
-
A24-1327
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(concluding that a jury’s finding of no negligence by the defendant mooted the issue of damages), rev. denied (Minn. June 27, 2000).
- Russell v. Johnson 608 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Russell v. Johnson
608 N.W.2d 895
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., 17 Wis.2d 510 , ); (holding if credible evidence supports no-liability verdict, jury’s denial of damages does not require a new trial).
- Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger 588 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Baker v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger 588 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Boubelik v. Liberty State Bank 553 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1996
- Carnahan v. Walsh 416 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Carnahan v. Walsh 416 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Stuttgen v. Gipe 404 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Stuttgen v. Gipe 404 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Norwest Bank Midland v. Shinnick 402 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Boie v. Melchert 402 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Boie v. Melchert 402 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Norwest Bank Midland v. Shinnick 402 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Larson v. Moorhead Country Club 395 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Larson v. Moorhead Country Club 395 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Tews v. Husqvarna, Inc. 390 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Tews v. Husqvarna, Inc. 390 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Fleahman v. Lehman 388 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Fleahman v. Lehman
388 N.W.2d 417
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
On appeal we will substitute our judgment for that of the jury “only if there is no evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict or if it is manifestly and palpably against the weight of the evidence.” (quoting Templin v. Crestliner, Inc., 263 Minn. 149, 151 , ).
- Sather v. Snedigar 372 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Sather v. Snedigar
372 N.W.2d 836
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
where a jury had found no damages the court stated: [I]f the verdict on liability is supported by credible evidence, the denial of damages will not entitle plaintiffs to a new trial * * * Id.
- Smith v. Carriere 316 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
- Smith v. Carriere 316 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1982
- Vikse v. Flaby 316 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1982
-
Vikse v. Flaby
316 N.W.2d 276
Minn. 1982
this court said: Where a party seeks a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, we will substitute our judgment for that of the jury “only if there is no evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict or if it is manifestly and palpably against the weight of the
- Pomush v. McGroarty 285 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1979
- Pomush v. McGroarty 285 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1979