Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Fitzimons, 261 N.W.2d 586.

37 citing documents.

Rydberg v. Goodno 689 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rydberg v. Goodno 689 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Generally, “[w]hen a plaintiff proves a prima facie case and it is unrebutted by defendant, the plaintiff has met his burden of proof.” Fidelity Bank Trust Co., v. Fitzimons
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The general rule in civil cases is that “[wjhere a plaintiff proves a prima facie ease and it is unrebutted by defendant, the plaintiff has met his burden of proof.” (quoting Fidelity Bank & ).
Kirsebom v. Connelly 486 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kirsebom v. Connelly 486 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Generally, “[wjhere a plaintiff proves a prima facie case and it is unrebut-ted by defendant, the plaintiff has met his burden of proof.” Fidelity Bank &amp
Reese Design, Inc. v. I-94 Highway 61 Eastview Center Partnership 428 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Reese Design, Inc. v. I-94 Highway 61 Eastview Center Partnership 428 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
citing Orvis v. Higgins, 180 F.2d 537, 539 (2nd Cir.1950)
Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. Mitchell 413 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. Mitchell 413 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Palmer v. Production Credit Ass'n 404 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Palmer v. Production Credit Ass'n 404 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hamilton v. Hamilton 396 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hamilton v. Hamilton 396 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rud v. Flood 385 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Becker v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Becker v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Aesoph v. Golden 367 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Aesoph v. Golden 367 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Where the only evidence consists of the parties’ conflicting testimony, a trial court’s findings should not be disturbed except under “the most unusual circumstances.”
Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283 358 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283 358 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hunt v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hunt v. Commissioner of Public Safety 356 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
T.P.B. Properties v. Coldwell, Banker & Co. 354 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
T.P.B. Properties v. Coldwell, Banker & Co. 354 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Fidelity Bank & the.
Diethelm v. Cavanaugh 349 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Diethelm v. Cavanaugh 349 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rule 41.02(2), Minn.R.Civil P.
In Re Estate of Lobe 348 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re Estate of Lobe 348 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Berry v. Goetz 348 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Berry v. Goetz 348 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Anda Construction Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Duluth 349 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Anda Construction Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Duluth 349 N.W.2d 275 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Snyder Electric Co. v. Fleming 305 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1981
Snyder Electric Co. v. Fleming 305 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1981
Den Mar Construction Co. v. American Insurance Co. 290 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1979
Den Mar Construction Co. v. American Insurance Co. 290 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1979