Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co., 261 N.W.2d 598.

83 citing documents.

Hedlund v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 373 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Benton County Agricultural Society v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Benton County Agricultural Society v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Classified Insurance Corp. v. Vodinelich 368 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1985
Classified Insurance Corp. v. Vodinelich 368 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1985
Co., (automobile policy context).
Jorgensen by Jorgensen v. Auto-Owners Ins. 360 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jorgensen by Jorgensen v. Auto-Owners Ins. 360 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hoekman 359 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hoekman 359 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“[F]or an injury to arise out of the use of an automobile, it must be causally related to the employment of the vehicle for transportation purposes” and “the vehicle itself must be an active accessory to the injury sustained.”
Classified Insurance Corp. v. Vodinelich 354 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Classified Insurance Corp. v. Vodinelich 354 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kolkin v. American Family Insurance Co. 347 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kolkin v. American Family Insurance Co. 347 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
North River Insurance Co. v. Dairyland Insurance Co. 346 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1984
North River Insurance Co. v. Dairyland Insurance Co. 346 N.W.2d 109 Minn. 1984
Petrick v. Transport Insurance Co. 343 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Petrick v. Transport Insurance Co. 343 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., “the vehicle itself must be an active accessory” to the injury.
Meric v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. 343 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Meric v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. 343 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., “the vehicle itself must be an active accessory” to the injury.
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska 331 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1983
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska 331 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1983
Co., we adopted the requirement of the Mississippi Supreme Court that “the vehicle itself must be an active accessory” to the injury sustained.
Krupenny v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 310 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1981
Krupenny v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. 310 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1981
Co., Eng eldinger v. State Auto & Cas.
Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 310 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1981
Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 310 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1981
Co., Engeldinger v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters, 306 Minn. 202, 208 , Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Ins.
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
Rausch v. Beech Aircraft Corp. 277 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1979
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
Rausch v. Beech Aircraft Corp. 277 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1979
The A. I. D. analysis has been adhered to by this court in Engeldinger v. State Automobile and Casualty Underwriters, 306 Minn. 202 , (death did not arise out of the use of an automobile where “automobile was a mere instrument, receptacle or situs of the primary negligence of the insured”) (injuries did not arise out of the use of an automobile where police car served only to transport insured to the scene of the battery).
Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co. 278 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1979
Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co. 278 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 1979
Co., (use of car to transport police officer to scene of his alleged battery not sufficient to support liability of insurer on car insurance policy); See, also, Engeldinger v. State Auto & Cas.