Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Columbus, 258 N.W.2d 122.

43 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Larry Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(defendant was the aggressor, in part, because “he made no attempt to avoid danger (for example, by turning the gun away from [the deceased])”).
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“The defendant became the aggressor by drawing, loading, and aiming the rifle .
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Delgado Espinosa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Delgado Espinosa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A defendant seeking acquittal on the basis of self-defense “has the burden of going forward with evidence to support his claim of self-defense.”
State v. Radke 821 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2012
State v. Radke 821 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2012
See Penkaty, d at 207 (noting that, although the defendant has the burden of going forward with evidence to support his claim of self-defense, the State alone bears the burden of proof on the issue); (similar).
State v. Edwards 717 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2006
State v. Edwards 717 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2006
State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
State v. Vazquez 644 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Vazquez 644 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Jensen 448 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Jensen 448 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
While there is no burden on appellant to prove self-defense at trial, he does have the “burden of going forward with evidence to support his claim of self-defense.” ().
State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
we explained the preliminary burden a defendant must meet in order to justify a self-defense instruction, While there is no burden on a defendant to prove self-defense, the defendant does have the “burden of going forward with evidence to support his claim of self-defense.”
State v. Hennum 428 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Hennum 428 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Peterson 411 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Peterson 411 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
While there is no burden on a defendant to prove self defense, the defendant [has] the “burden of going forward with evidence to support his claim of self defense.” ().
State v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
State v. Graham 371 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1985
Self-Defense Instruction While there is no burden on a defendant to prove self-defense, the defendant does have the “burden of going forward with evidence to support his claim of self-defense.”
State v. Stephani 369 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Stephani 369 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Soine 348 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Soine 348 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Austin 332 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1983
State v. Austin 332 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1983
State v. Johnson 310 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1981
State v. Johnson 310 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1981
State v. Turnipseed 297 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1980
State v. Turnipseed 297 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 1980
State v. Spaulding 296 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1980
State v. Spaulding 296 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1980
State v. Morgan 296 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1980
State v. Morgan 296 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1980
State v. Johnson, 277 Minn. 368, 373
State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
State v. Harvey 277 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1979
State v. Harvey 277 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1979
In State v. Columbus, Minn., , we held that: “In Minnesota, the rule is that in homicide cases no burden rests upon the defendant to prove that he acted in self defense.