Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., 260 N.W.2d 181.

49 citing documents.

Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 448 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 448 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1989
For example, an employee who continued to antagonize other employees and spread rumors after warnings to refrain from this disrupting conduct committed “misconduct.” Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Reed v. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Golden Valley, District 5 422 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Reed v. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Golden Valley, District 5 422 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
with or adversely affected his employment.” The case of Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., cited by the DOT, does not answer this question.
State Ex Rel. Khalifa v. Hennepin County 420 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State Ex Rel. Khalifa v. Hennepin County 420 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller 358 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller 358 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Cherveny v. 10,000 AUTO PARTS 353 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cherveny v. 10,000 AUTO PARTS 353 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., ); see also Group Health Plan
Daniels v. Gnan Trucking 352 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Daniels v. Gnan Trucking 352 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., see also Group Health Plan
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rutten v. Rockie International, Inc. 349 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline 348 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline 348 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(citing Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., ); see also Group Health Plan
Mastley v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mastley v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., Group Health Plan
Dawson v. Northland Beverages, Inc. 347 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dawson v. Northland Beverages, Inc. 347 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., Group Health Plan
Preiss v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Preiss v. Commissioner of Economic Security 347 N.W.2d 74 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
see Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Sticha v. McDonald's No. 291 346 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Evenson v. Omnetic's 344 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Evenson v. Omnetic's 344 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., King v. Little Italy, supra.
Flahave v. Lang Meat Packing 343 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Flahave v. Lang Meat Packing 343 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
King v. Little Italy 341 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Callander v. Starkman Drug, Inc. 341 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
McBride v. LeVasseur 341 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Callander v. Starkman Drug, Inc. 341 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
On judicial review, the findings are to “be reviewed in the light most favorable to the decision, and if there is evidence reasonably tending to sustain them, they will not be disturbed.” see Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
McBride v. LeVasseur 341 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Booker v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez 341 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez 341 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
see Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Ramirez v. Metro Waste Control Commission 340 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Ramirez v. Metro Waste Control Commission 340 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
See also Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., Chellson v. State Division of Employment and Security, 214 Minn. 332, 335
White v. Metropolitan Medical Center 332 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1983
White v. Metropolitan Medical Center 332 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1983
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
RESERVE MIN. CO., BABBITT DIV. v. Gorecki 316 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1982
RESERVE MIN. CO., BABBITT DIV. v. Gorecki 316 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1982
Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc.
Brown v. Port of Sunnyside Club, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1981
Brown v. Port of Sunnyside Club, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1981
See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (per curiam); Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., (per curiam).
Auger v. Gillette Co. 303 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1981
Auger v. Gillette Co. 303 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 1981
See also Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., (employee’s actions caused dissension and disruption within department).
Thurik v. Department of Economic Security 288 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1980
Thurik v. Department of Economic Security 288 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1980
1 (1978); Booher v. Transport Clearings of Twin Cities, Inc., and Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co., 295 Minn. 372
Claims of Heilman v. United Dressed Beef Co. 273 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1978
Claims of Heilman v. United Dressed Beef Co. 273 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1978
E. g., Ideker v. LaCrescent Nursing Home, 296 Minn. 240 , Blom v. Madsen’s Enterprises, Inc., 298 Minn. 573 , in which the claimant also refused to perform work within her assigned duties; Booher v. Transport Clearings, Inc.