Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Discipline of Scallen, 269 N.W.2d 834.

44 citing documents.

In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Brian James ENGEL, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 299790 859 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692 850 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 2014
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692 850 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 2014
See, -86 (Minn. 1984); In re 10 Olkon, -42 (Minn. 1978).
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Andrade 736 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 2007
Appeal of Admonition Regarding A.M.E. 533 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1995
Appeal of Admonition Regarding A.M.E. 533 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1995
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Perry 494 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1992
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Perry 494 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1992
In re Panel's Affirmance of Director of Professional Responsibility's Admonition in Panel Matter No. 87-22 425 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1988
In re Panel's Affirmance of Director of Professional Responsibility's Admonition in Panel Matter No. 87-22 425 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1988
At the same time, we have warned that an attorney who becomes entangled in his client’s business “must meticulously differentiate his role as an attorney from that of a businessman.”
Matter of Discipline of Wareham 413 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Wareham 413 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Ray 408 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Ray 408 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 1987
In Re the Discipline of Isaacs 406 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1987
In Re the Discipline of Isaacs 406 N.W.2d 526 Minn. 1987
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Knutson 405 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1987
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Knutson 405 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Schmidt 402 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
Matter of Discipline of Schmidt 402 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1987
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simonson 365 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1985
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simonson 365 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1985
He cites Daffer, and to suggest that this court has consistently imposed some period of suspension for comparable misconduct.
Matter of Discipline of Kraemer 361 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1985
Matter of Discipline of Kraemer 361 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1985
(attorney convicted of two counts of attempted theft by swindle suspended for two years); -43 (Minn.1978) (attorney’s foreign conviction of theft and publishing a false prospectus warranted indefinite suspension).
Matter of Disciplinary Action Against Franke 345 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1984
Matter of Disciplinary Action Against Franke 345 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1984
Petition of Disciplinary Action Against Daffer 344 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1984
Petition of Disciplinary Action Against Daffer 344 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1984
Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against Weyhrich 339 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1983
Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against Weyhrich 339 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1983
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lee 334 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1983
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lee 334 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1983
Matter of Nelson 327 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1982
Matter of Nelson 327 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1982
We stated in that "[w]e have in the past and will in the future continue to place great weight upon the recommendations of the referee concerning disciplinary sanctions."
Matter of Larson 324 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1982
Matter of Larson 324 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1982
Matter of Olkon 324 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1982
Matter of Olkon 324 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1982
Matter of Discipline of Fling 316 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1982
Matter of Discipline of Fling 316 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1982
In Re the Disbarment of Hedlund 293 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1980
Followed In Re the Disbarment of Hedlund 293 N.W.2d 63 Minn. 1980
As we stated in : [Scalien contends] the facts necessarily found by the Canadian jury in support of its guilty verdict are not entitled to full weight in a disciplinary proceeding in this country.
In Re the Disbarment of Ojala 289 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1979
In Re the Disbarment of Ojala 289 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1979
As we said in “The dictates of the Code of Professional Responsibility follow an attorney wherever he or she may travel and govern the attorney’s every activity.”