Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bogen v. Bogen, 261 N.W.2d 606.

173 citing documents.

Marriage of Petterson v. Petterson 366 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rohling v. Rohling 363 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rohling v. Rohling 363 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hein v. Hein 366 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Yackel v. Yackel 366 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hein v. Hein 366 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Yackel v. Yackel 366 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Novick v. Novick 366 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Novick v. Novick 366 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Alvord v. Alvord 365 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Alvord v. Alvord 365 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Martin v. Martin 364 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Martin v. Martin 364 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Johnson, 284 Minn. 181
Marriage of Gabrielson v. Gabrielson 363 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Gabrielson v. Gabrielson 363 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Pekarek v. Pekarek 362 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Pekarek v. Pekarek 362 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hedelius v. Hedelius 361 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hedelius v. Hedelius 361 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kowalzek v. Kowalzek 360 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kowalzek v. Kowalzek 360 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Ellesmere v. Ellesmere 359 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Ellesmere v. Ellesmere 359 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Although a trial court has broad discretion in the division of marital property, the overriding requirement of the statute governing the division of marital property is that the division be equitable.
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Montgomery v. Montgomery 358 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Ferguson v. Ferguson 357 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re the Marriage of Frank 357 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re the Marriage of Frank 357 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Oberle v. Oberle 355 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Oberle v. Oberle 355 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Nolan v. Nolan 354 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Nolan v. Nolan 354 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, Bogen *514 v. Bogen, (shared rights of occupancy are the primary objection to awards of undivided interests in real property).
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 352 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Johnson v. Johnson 352 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted the statute as giving the trial court “broad discretion to award one of the parties the right to occupy the parties’ homestead exclusive or otherwise.” This is the kind of discretion that is not overturned but for clear abuse.
Marriage of Dammann v. Dammann 351 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Dammann v. Dammann 351 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Stassen v. Stassen 351 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Stassen v. Stassen 351 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Lammi v. Lammi 348 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Lammi v. Lammi 348 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Filkins v. Filkins 347 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kreidler v. Kreidler 348 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Kreidler v. Kreidler 348 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Roberson, 296 Minn. at 478 , d at 348